Pre-amp or Pre-pro,, which one to get ?

I agree with doug. I considered doing the pre-processor route. Some considerations: 1) It's expensive to buy a processor, and this processor tends to lose value fast. 2) The processor's digital section will fall out of step with digitial technology pretty fast. 3) It's nice to have the flexibility of a separate preamp. You can later split it into two stereos if you like. 4) I think that most home theater stuff is built to a little lower standard sonically A generalization - I haven't listened to many of them. 5) A two channel pre will throw another box on your audio rack. .....For preamps, the adcom gfp-750 is an excellent inexpensive 2 channel preamp with a processor input. I have one for sale!

Avitar, it's my understanding any preamp with a tape loop will feed the two channel, line level signal out to a separate processor. The processor will need it's own volume control though. Enjoy the journey.

rockvirgo, ewe are correct, but the preamps w/the processor-default function allows the processor's controls to operate the main 2-channel speakers. a bit more conwenient, i'd think.

doug

Second that sounds right to me. Once we get the DSP'd signal looped back into the preamp something's gotta regulate it. Shortening the signal path by bypassing the preamp's volume control sounds like a good idea. Cool.

I have built a switching box to allow for dual pre-amps. Switch one way for stereo and the other for video. I agree with others that it is a pain in the neck trying to decide on the Pre/Pro route. If I were to look at new Pre's I'd probably have a look at the VTL 2.5 or 5.5 depending on budget. In the mean time just make a switch between your amp and pre. I use a classe 5 for audio and just a Denon reciever with pre outs for video(AVP1800). Make sure you use quality switches, wire and jacks. Bought mine at the Parts Connection.