Arthur Salvatore WoW comments??


Anyone ever read about this audio critic? his site is at http://www.high-endaudio.com/ but for the real deal go there and scroll down to 'audio critique' and click on that link and you will not be able to stop reading. i recommend reading his 'philosophy' first and then his 'recommended components list' - although i know you guys will reverse that order; it was worth a try.
This guy has some very interesting things to say about audio and has really gotten hot and heavy with the top magazines and he's published his heated correspondences with them and you'll love it.
Please comment here after reading about this guy.
kublakhan
Kubla, wasn't hyperbole...CFB will you please let me out?. I'm uncomfortably too close to the law....I promise, I'll deposit an afidavid ( how the shit do you spell that?) in your medulla oblongata taking responsibility for those three and another threehundred shits you may drop here or anywhere else before I go. But p l e a s e let me out!!!!!
detlof: be spelled "affidavit." from what confine do you wish to be released? in my book, you're free as a dove and, if emulating the "founder" of the vienna circle, as high as a kite. or, perhaps, this dreamlike perception is only devotedly to be wished. sure glad you've opened the door to sunshine and hope there are no more bags of homo sapiens shit on which you may step. (BTW, i can't quite follow the "deposit in [my] medulla oblongata" reference. as i recall from my undergraduate studies, the medulla is the center of involuntary nerve activity. are you suggesting that my "art" is below the level of consciousness? if so...... interesting. have you read "the origins of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind" by jaynes?) sorry to go off-topic, folks, but i figure i'm owed some kinda payback for all those years of psychotherapy.
Just what is the topic here? And don't you need a topic before you can go off topic? Other than the word shit, I really don't see a topic anymore. As such, I perceive no need for an apology for any variation therefrom. I do think if there ever was a topic, you two boys are nowhere near it. But that's good. Really good, in fact. I can't wait to see where this all goes.
'therefrom?' thunders, your law education is showing. and detlof, good GOD man, you are nothing if not good fodder for all the right-wingers who have declared an all-out war on drugs. I believe, as obviously you believe, that ecstasy (or apparently SOME drug) is a valid form of psychotherapy. Perhaps not when self-administered (as we’ve just witnessed in your post) but then there’s the expression, doctor heal thy self that can be thrown into the argument and then we’re back to square one.

And as for you CFB, you never cease to amaze me. I actually have read ‘the origins of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind’ by julian jaynes. In fact, it freaked me out very early on and I had to put it down for about a year or two. If I remember he began to talk about the concept we have as ‘I’ and ‘me’ as only a metaphor and he scared the holy crap of me when 'I' suddenly ‘got it.' It seems pertinent here in some way because I’ve only begun to realize the metaphor of these threads and how the ‘i’ and ‘me’ issue jaynes touched upon ...um...where am we?