2. tech-talk
  3. 999265201

CD Clubs -Press their own CD's?

I was thinking of joining a CD Club, like BMG or Columbia House, and I read the following quote from Dealdude.com, "The clubs press their own CDs, tack on shipping and handling fees of about $2 per CD, and work out special royalty deals with the labels...".

What is meant by, "The clubs press their own CDs"? Are these inferior to what can be purchased at the store?

http://dealdude.com/cdclubs.html?source=findwhat
brianmgrarcom
marakanetz's avatar
marakanetz
5,473 posts
 
What I know is BMG labeled CDs are much worse in sound quality than same artist/album non-BMG which gives me an idea that they remanufacture CDs with poor bulk quality. Columbia House is OK in that direction since they trade with originally pressed ones. For shipping-handling they do overcharge but there still possible to find a good deal on each of CD that you order from them. For example if you are obligated to buy off 6 CDs at original club price for 3 years of membership, you can buy them on buy 1 get 3 free deals and fulfill your obligation with such offers. At the end it figures that you'll have a bunch of sealed CDs at average price of $6!
Post removed 
marakanetz's avatar
marakanetz
5,473 posts
 
...that's just what I thoght it is, Gs5556! --
Very informative and I am now more shure that I'm not nuts
sugarbrie
3,854 posts
 
I suggest you all read the Stereophile article linked above. It found no difference what-so-ever; and the testing done was substantial. This included mixing/combining the two CDs with the polarity reversed on one. If they are identical they will cancel each other out. If one is inferior, then sound will be heard. All of the CDs tested passed this test completely (as well as all the other tests performed. I have been buying record club CDs since CDs came out. I have never had a defective CD. I have returned CDs bought in the store for replacement.
sean
6,231 posts
 
Sugar, i too have been buying cd's from BMG and noticed the "manufactured for BMG" on the liner notes. I just "assumed" that the discs were made specifically for them by the original manufacturer.

While i have never done a side by side listening comparison of a BMG disc to an "untampered" store bought disc, i have LOOKED at a BMG compared to a non BMG. The specific disc in question was by a local band called "Ministry" that some of you might be familiar with. The two discs were NOT the same in terms of actual space that was used on the disc i.e. there was more "dead space" on one disc than the other. If i can recall correctly, the one that showed less physical data was the BMG disc. The reason that i did not do a "fair" side by side listening comparison is that i had already "cut" one of the discs with my Audio Desk Systeme, so it would not have been an apples to apples comparison. There WAS a difference in the discs, but i would attribute that mostly to the benefits of "cutting" the one to not cutting the other one. Sean
>
More to discover