ST202 - a nice classic B&K, and I concur with Reubent - sure you can reuse these for good (maybe even great) effect. But the 202 is what, 140w or so? And a little soft and slow perhaps. A nice and comfortable sound from solid-state, but if you're powering monitors with it, you're probably not going to get what many philes would consider great detail.
The ST202 gives you probably more juice than you need even for great headroom in a "small system". Don't get me wrong, I just bought another fella's 202+ (200w vers.) for one of my systems and love it, but for a monitor system, I'd probably think about an amp with more detail and swing than the B&K.
My experience with the B&K classics has been that they've sounded best on large floorstanders (cone/basket) of fair-to-high sensitivity. Didn't do it for me on horns or with monitors. You won't be putting yourself in any pinch to use it however - but if you're looking to play "small ball", the B&K probably isn't your leadoff hitter for detail etc. Their strengths really lie elsewhere I think.
The ST202 gives you probably more juice than you need even for great headroom in a "small system". Don't get me wrong, I just bought another fella's 202+ (200w vers.) for one of my systems and love it, but for a monitor system, I'd probably think about an amp with more detail and swing than the B&K.
My experience with the B&K classics has been that they've sounded best on large floorstanders (cone/basket) of fair-to-high sensitivity. Didn't do it for me on horns or with monitors. You won't be putting yourself in any pinch to use it however - but if you're looking to play "small ball", the B&K probably isn't your leadoff hitter for detail etc. Their strengths really lie elsewhere I think.