I'll be posting more about Richard Hardesty's work on other subjects, but he had just a short bit to say about tweaks. Generally, I believe his position was most tweaks are not worth the money spent (I assume directed at commercial tweaks), which mirrors a comment made in this thread. I believe he also infers that most tweaks damage the sound (or the accuracy of the sound, at least) rather than help it.
If you agree with Hardesty's theories - and particularly his position on tweaks - then most tweaks are useless or worse, harmful.
Thoughts?
If you agree with Hardesty's theories - and particularly his position on tweaks - then most tweaks are useless or worse, harmful.
Thoughts?