Ok, first off, that quote from Stereo Times stretches the limits of credibility. "Transparency to die for"? Really? Come on.
Second, your interpretation of my last post is odd, to put it politely. I was NOT saying that the results of every fuse listening test are ambiguous. I was saying that there is ambiguity present in every A/B listening test WHEN YOU ARE UNABLE TO DISCERN A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A AND B.
If that was not obvious from the sentence you quoted, it should have been obvious from the very next sentence...
Oh, and one other thing. Your mischaracterization of my comments falls into a category you have a particular affection for...
It is a Straw Man.
Bryon
Second, your interpretation of my last post is odd, to put it politely. I was NOT saying that the results of every fuse listening test are ambiguous. I was saying that there is ambiguity present in every A/B listening test WHEN YOU ARE UNABLE TO DISCERN A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A AND B.
If that was not obvious from the sentence you quoted, it should have been obvious from the very next sentence...
In other words, WHEN YOU FAIL TO HEAR A DIFFERENCE DURING AN A/B, there are always three possible interpretations... [emphasis added]I suspect, of all the people following this thread, your uncharitable interpretation of my post is unique. That should tell you something.
Oh, and one other thing. Your mischaracterization of my comments falls into a category you have a particular affection for...
It is a Straw Man.
Bryon