2. speakers
  3. 1132090190

Questions on Totem Hawks & Von Schweikert VR2

Hi. I am intersted in upgrading my current Vandersteen 1C speakers to a full-sized speaker that more closely matches my musical tastes (rock of all kinds, trip hop). My budget is around the $1500 mark used, and I am very happy with my current amp (Sim Audio I-5) and source (Sim Audio Nova), so I don't want to change them; I'm only considering changing my speakers.

I've done a lot of research here and elsewhere. Based on what I have read, I have narrowed my list to two speakers that I feel would be a good match for my system and my music: Totem Hawk & Von Schweikert VR2.

My living room is 22'x14'x8', but the listening area is more like 14'x14'. Other considerations include having to place the speakers no more than 18" from the long wall, the presence of small kids (ages 7 & 4), and that I live in an apartment. I don't generally blast my music, but do listen to "lively" music, so I want more "punch." I am still pleased with my Vandy's, but think that I can do better match-wise.

My concern with the Hawks relate to ease of being driven by the I-5's 70 wpc (I've read mixed things here), and my concern with the VR2s is the apparent need for them to be placed 2-3 feet from the wall (not possible for me). I am not interested in bookshelf speakers, and my reading has led me to these two speakers because of perceived quality, match with my music/equipment, size (smaller compared to my vandy's), value/price, and sonic characteristics. Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, - Steve
walkman
mimberman
299 posts
 
I'll chime in here since I'm both a Totem owner, and listen to similar tunes.

I think the Hawks will ultimately work better in your room and with your gear. It's not that the Vandys aren't great speakers, because they are, but I find the Hawks particularly adept at integrating into difficult environments, while still preserving their uncanny imaging. Furthermore, I've done a good deal of listening to Sim and Totem gear, and find that the i-5 and Nova with the Hawks sounds great (and the i-5 is ideally suited to drive the Hawks). The bass, while not gut rattling, is indeed punchy and articulated, and you can always augment the low frequencies (of any speaker, within reason) by adding a sub. The imaging/soundstaging is pretty uncanny, and these are great looking speakers (I have the Forests in Maple, and love the light colored wood vs. the sleek chrome legs and dark drivers).

Ultimately, if you're buying the Hawks used, you could probably resell them with little to no loss, because they are fairly popular. I'm sure the same goes for the Vandys. It seems like you're just trying to see what the next step would be compared to your speakers now, and if you wanted earth shaking volume capabilities and low frequency extension, then you'd most likely end up replacing your i-5 anyway. At this point I think the Hawks represent a great purchase, IMHO.

Enjoy,

Matt
walkman OP
50 posts
 
Thanks Matt, I appreciate the well-articulated reply...and suggestion on the Hawks. You hit several keys of mine on the head, speaking to synergy with my amp and source (and driveability, a potential concern I have based on some other posts I have read about the Hawks here), room size, and my tastes in music. And, you are correct in your assessment that I am trying to see what the next steps would be for me now regarding speakers. Coincidentally, maple would also be the finish of choice for me given my other furniture finishes. All in all, your post was most relevant...so, thanks!

Drubin: No, I have not considered moving up the Vandy line. While I do like my 1C's (I am not disappointed or frustrated, but am intrigued by a speaker upgrade/change that might better suit my musical tastes), I find the Vandy's to be a bit on the large size (as in width and footprint), and, all things being equal (which I know they are not), would like to have a smaller floorstanding speaker, but also one that has a reputation for being faster and more dynamic. I think the vandy's are more warm, relaxed and musical (all of which is good, but perhaps I'm seeking a different flavor).

thx again, - steve
robm321
932 posts
 
I've heard both, and you can't go wrong with either speaker. To be honest, you really should listen to both. They have different sounds - both great in their own ways.

I prefer the VR2 simply because they have a smooth neutral sound and create a better soundstage because of the global axis system (or whatever it's called).

The Hawks are smooth and have sparkle, but my taste is for the VS. It's really a personal thing between these two, and I hope you won't decide based on any opinions here because you could end up wondering if you should have gone for the other one after your purchase.

Both also work great with tube gear, just an fyi.
rumadian
152 posts
 
Walkman,

The Hawks are world class speakers that when treated right, can do things most speakers on this planet only wish they could do. With that being said, the Hawks are not the most versitile speakers on the planet and are very picky with room and electronics. The Sim gear is a decent match with the Hawks and your room size is about right for this speaker.

With that said, the VS VR-2 is technically a far lesser product although it can be the better tool for the job in many instances. It is much easier on room placement and equipment matching and can mask up some of those nasty recordings that run fairly rampid with your musical tastes..

For your listening tastes, I would look at NEAT acoustics or vintage Polk Audio SDA's.
walkman OP
50 posts
 
Thans Rumadian and Robm321. I appreciate the posts. It seems like I've narrowed down my selection to two recommended speakers, and yet there are always more...the more input, the better, so thanks again. - steve
More to discover