Ref. 3a , GMA & Tyler compare ?

I can't comment on the 3A as I have not heard that one (but I do hear a lot of good things about it)...

As for the Tylers and GMAs, I have heard both of these, and have owned the Signature Monitors (technically I still do, as they are the top half of my Linbrook System two piece floorstanders).

I The GMA Callistos I heard about 3 months back and was quite impressed. They get much lower than one might expect, and they had very nice sounstage depth and detail. Classical music seemed to mesh very well with them in particular, and I could easily be happy with them in my home (save for their looks that just don't do it for me, but did for the other person who auditioned them with me)...

The Linbrooks are warmer speakers than the GMAs and get even lower bass still. Speed of drivers and midrange are both close between the two, but I give the edge to the Linbrooks. Top end is about a draw IMO... I loved them both in that area. Dynamics I would give a slight edge to the Linbrooks...

Bottom line is both speakers are superb and I am sure you would be happy with either of them... If you prefer a bit of a warmer sound then probably the Linbrooks would be a closer fit (but keep in mind they are rear ported, so yo will need some space behind them)... If your tastes are a bit more bright (but not overly so) then the Callistos may be what you are looking for...

---Dave

>> your tastes are a bit more bright (but not overly so)
>> then the Callistos may be what you are looking for...

something is not right here when a person calls the Callisto "bright"!!
I've heard these speakers & would not call them bright in any way, shape or form.
Maybe the Linnbrooks are warm/soft just as some tube amps have that tubey sound from the 1970s & 1980s?
(I'm trying to get a feel for the Linnbrook sound using just words! ;-) )

I've owned and used Reference 3A MM DeCapos (non-i version) and Tyler Tylo Reference Monitors in my smallish room. They are setup in a nearfield setup. For my room and taste, I easily prefer the DeCapos. The bass is more solid and well defined, the midrange is better developed and the highs are just right. I also like the idea that you can drive them with almost any amp (in a small room). I've used everything from a 1.5 watt/channel 45 amp, 5 watt/ch. 2A3 tube amp, 40 watt "chip amp" and 170 watt HT receiver.

If you can find a pair of DeCapos at a good price, buy them and try them. They are very popular, so you could just re-sell them if you didn't love them.

Enjoy,

TIC

This is great guys , thank you .
I will be able to audition the De Capo's , hopefully this weekend . But the others will have to be decided here , probably as compared to the De Capo's .

Bombaywalla ; I feel your pain . It can be rather difficult to get a feel for something with just words .

Ruebent ; That is interesting . I would've thought that the Tyler's would be a tough act to beat due to the components used . I guess implementation is what counts . What size is your room and how close to the speakers are you sitting ? Do they have body and presence at low listening levels ?

Heli_dog ; Good link , thank you .

Chadlinz ; That is an interesting question , I will try to ask the manufacturer .

Drseid ; what components accompanied the Callisto's in the demo that you heard ? Did the other auditioner buy the Callisto's ?

Thanks people , keep them coming .

Saki, I'm posting only because of a couple of comments above might mislead you. FWIW as I have no experience with either the DeCapos or the Calisto's and my experience with the Tylers is the Linbrook Signature 1 piece floor stander's - My point of comparison is the Quad 63's and Paragon Jubilee/Jem, both of which are very neutral and revealing systems.

The Tylers are a tad warmer thru the lower mid-range BUT the bass is tight and the mid-range/highs are very detailed/transparent without being bright.

Contrary to what Bombaywalla sez (and I don't note that he sez he has actually listened to Linbrooks) these speakers are NOT reminiscent of soft/mushy tube stuff from the 70's and 80's NOR are they made artificially bright to give a false impression of detail and transparency.

Note that Rubent is talking about totally different speakers. Different box and drivers. The Linbrooks are a meaningful upgrade from the Reference monitors. The Seas millenium tweeter makes a hugh difference, as does the MTM set up and increased mid-range bass response from having two drivers to cover.

As I said, FWIW.