There seems to be a lot of contention about Wilson products, price, size, weight, sound, color...everyone seems to have an opinion.
In my life I have found Cost vs. Value is generally in the depth of my wallet.
A couple of examples...
I use to think that Mobile Fidelity recordings were way too much money and not a good financial value, until years later when my income level increased to the point of having disposable cash, now I am sorry I did not purchase the complete catalog as they were released. If I had of they would now be Value vs. Cost (what an investment that would have been)
Or...in my younger years Steak and Lobster was way over rated and quite frankly not worth the expense, hamburgers and fries were the way to go.
Steak and Hamburger come from the same source, so why such a discrepancy, or disparity in price, as they are both beef. It takes more work and time to produce hamburger than steak so why is steak more expensive? I now think steak is expensive but not over rated as I can now afford it on a regular basis.
Is it right to assume Cost vs. Value is a derivative of income, and does it sway or have a bearing on a persons opinions toward a product?
How many of the posters on this thread actually own, or have owned, WIlson products?
Out of the people who have, what do you feel about the cost vs value issue now, are you comfortable with what you paid, or do you now feel the price was inflated, and you did not get good value?
In my life I have found Cost vs. Value is generally in the depth of my wallet.
A couple of examples...
I use to think that Mobile Fidelity recordings were way too much money and not a good financial value, until years later when my income level increased to the point of having disposable cash, now I am sorry I did not purchase the complete catalog as they were released. If I had of they would now be Value vs. Cost (what an investment that would have been)
Or...in my younger years Steak and Lobster was way over rated and quite frankly not worth the expense, hamburgers and fries were the way to go.
Steak and Hamburger come from the same source, so why such a discrepancy, or disparity in price, as they are both beef. It takes more work and time to produce hamburger than steak so why is steak more expensive? I now think steak is expensive but not over rated as I can now afford it on a regular basis.
Is it right to assume Cost vs. Value is a derivative of income, and does it sway or have a bearing on a persons opinions toward a product?
How many of the posters on this thread actually own, or have owned, WIlson products?
Out of the people who have, what do you feel about the cost vs value issue now, are you comfortable with what you paid, or do you now feel the price was inflated, and you did not get good value?