Dave,
Yeah exactly, "experience is the better teacher" such as my personal experience of general contracting my room and seeing first hand how the room modes effect my room from the before and finished states of the room. As well as locating with meters where the nulls and reinforcements are in my room so I can build Helmholtz resonators to try and lower the harder to treat mode reinforcements.
The problem can be worked out, if he picks good room ratio proportions. If he sticks with the ones he has or takes only 8' off instead of a little more or a little less, then he is going to have some major bass reinforcement modes at certain frequencies that the Mode Calcultor I "linked to" shows. It is so simple for him a this point to partition the room to the right size to get ratios that are good enough for a very even room response, but you are trying to curtly convince him otherwise. Take it from someone who has these issues in a room where he couldn't alter the dimensions, it is better to fix it before hand than to get everything set up and have to deal with it afterwards. EQing is not as good of a solution as making the dimensions right to beginning with, I know this because I have been considering EQing for my space and consequently was researching the options (the only analog ones that look worthwhile are professional studio gear because you can cut out nulls as well as reinforcements thus cutting down on "smearing," otherwise you have to digitize the signal and then correct it). Getting the dimensions right to begin with cuts down on having to use large amounts of treatments or even an EQ.
How about instead of giving comforting generalizations, you give some specifics. You claim you are giving "facts," yet you didn't state any "facts" and you didn't leave any links to proof that you are not full of it. Please do provide some proof. "Because I say so" doesn't qualify as expertise, especially since I can provide proof from respected and scientifically valid sources in the acoustic's field (those links say it all!), and so far your only argument has been "because I say so."
Look at the room mode calculator I put up, and plug in those room dimensions he is thinking of... They make those calculators because these problems really do exist in the real world, not because they don't. His dimension choices of 40 x 24 x 11 will have some serious mode reinforcement, as will his other choice of 32 x 24 x 11. If he alters it a little bit using the calculator, he will have one hell of a room, yet you are trying to convince him not to. Why is that? Do you not want him to have the best sounding room possible? What could possibly motivate you to try to deter him from improving his listening environment in a situation where he can do so, so easily because he is already possibly partitioning the room?
It will sound better than mine if he changes the dimensions properly and treats it well to boot. My room is very well designed by Rives Audio. I couldn't change my dimensions so I'm forced to deal with overlapping room modes that couldn't be treated because they were too low in frequency. He can deal with that problem before he even has it, so I'm hoping he can benefit from my "real world" experience with building and measuring my own room's interactions with ETF5, mics, and SPLs as well as all the time I have spent in the last year researching room acoustics in theory and as applied to my room by Rives Audio (with books like Master Handbook of Acoustics and the online material I posted plus others).
If he uses these dimensions (31 x 24 x 11 or 39 x 24 x 11) for the larger room he flattens his room response immensely. Just look on the room mode calculator and plug those dimensions in... If you don't think it will make a tremendous difference when all is said and done, you have never had to tackle these problems in your own room or measured your own acoustic listening environment (that or you got lucky and already have good dimensions to begin with - in which case, it would explain why you don't know any better...).
He will still have the option of optimal speaker placement no matter what room size he uses, since all room sizes have optimal positions for the speakers and listening position. If he changes the dimensions by 1' (either 1' less than 40' or 1' less than 32') he doesn't lose much space and he gains tremendously in terms of acoustics, eliminating the need for a lot of the band-aid efforts you suggest (he should still treat the first reflection points in the room no matter what he does, as well as add extra absorption/diffusion randomly to kill slap echo and other reflection issues in the room).
Yeah exactly, "experience is the better teacher" such as my personal experience of general contracting my room and seeing first hand how the room modes effect my room from the before and finished states of the room. As well as locating with meters where the nulls and reinforcements are in my room so I can build Helmholtz resonators to try and lower the harder to treat mode reinforcements.
The problem can be worked out, if he picks good room ratio proportions. If he sticks with the ones he has or takes only 8' off instead of a little more or a little less, then he is going to have some major bass reinforcement modes at certain frequencies that the Mode Calcultor I "linked to" shows. It is so simple for him a this point to partition the room to the right size to get ratios that are good enough for a very even room response, but you are trying to curtly convince him otherwise. Take it from someone who has these issues in a room where he couldn't alter the dimensions, it is better to fix it before hand than to get everything set up and have to deal with it afterwards. EQing is not as good of a solution as making the dimensions right to beginning with, I know this because I have been considering EQing for my space and consequently was researching the options (the only analog ones that look worthwhile are professional studio gear because you can cut out nulls as well as reinforcements thus cutting down on "smearing," otherwise you have to digitize the signal and then correct it). Getting the dimensions right to begin with cuts down on having to use large amounts of treatments or even an EQ.
How about instead of giving comforting generalizations, you give some specifics. You claim you are giving "facts," yet you didn't state any "facts" and you didn't leave any links to proof that you are not full of it. Please do provide some proof. "Because I say so" doesn't qualify as expertise, especially since I can provide proof from respected and scientifically valid sources in the acoustic's field (those links say it all!), and so far your only argument has been "because I say so."
Look at the room mode calculator I put up, and plug in those room dimensions he is thinking of... They make those calculators because these problems really do exist in the real world, not because they don't. His dimension choices of 40 x 24 x 11 will have some serious mode reinforcement, as will his other choice of 32 x 24 x 11. If he alters it a little bit using the calculator, he will have one hell of a room, yet you are trying to convince him not to. Why is that? Do you not want him to have the best sounding room possible? What could possibly motivate you to try to deter him from improving his listening environment in a situation where he can do so, so easily because he is already possibly partitioning the room?
It will sound better than mine if he changes the dimensions properly and treats it well to boot. My room is very well designed by Rives Audio. I couldn't change my dimensions so I'm forced to deal with overlapping room modes that couldn't be treated because they were too low in frequency. He can deal with that problem before he even has it, so I'm hoping he can benefit from my "real world" experience with building and measuring my own room's interactions with ETF5, mics, and SPLs as well as all the time I have spent in the last year researching room acoustics in theory and as applied to my room by Rives Audio (with books like Master Handbook of Acoustics and the online material I posted plus others).
If he uses these dimensions (31 x 24 x 11 or 39 x 24 x 11) for the larger room he flattens his room response immensely. Just look on the room mode calculator and plug those dimensions in... If you don't think it will make a tremendous difference when all is said and done, you have never had to tackle these problems in your own room or measured your own acoustic listening environment (that or you got lucky and already have good dimensions to begin with - in which case, it would explain why you don't know any better...).
He will still have the option of optimal speaker placement no matter what room size he uses, since all room sizes have optimal positions for the speakers and listening position. If he changes the dimensions by 1' (either 1' less than 40' or 1' less than 32') he doesn't lose much space and he gains tremendously in terms of acoustics, eliminating the need for a lot of the band-aid efforts you suggest (he should still treat the first reflection points in the room no matter what he does, as well as add extra absorption/diffusion randomly to kill slap echo and other reflection issues in the room).