20+ years is a long time - so choose wisely. If you want a statement/conversation piece then the Beolab looks like it came from Forbidden Planet - no guest will miss it - it is a stunning art item as well as a speaker. Since you listen to music as a background thing then it may well be the correct choice. However it is towards the "unconventional" fringes of designs. The Wilson's may not elicit automatic comments from guests but they are a more conventional tried and proven box speaker design with plenty of models in service for many years and with many parts available.
Beolab 5 - Four Questionable Technologies
I'm looking to buy a high-end speaker system and have become enamored by the Beolab 5 Powered Speakers by B&O.
In their literature the tout 4 technologies that set them apart.
I am not an audiophile (yet) but wonder what those with more experience think about these four ideas.
1. An Acoustic Lens technology
This means a much wider dispersion of high frequencies. Supposedly this makes sweet spot for listening is much larger. This means you can sit in different places or move around and still have optimal sound.
2. Adaptive Bass Control
This uses a microphone in each speaker to calibrate the low frequency interaction with the room. This permits a wider range of speaker placement. For example, one could be near a wall, or one could be near a corner and this would compensate.
3. Digital Signal Processing
Being all digital, each speaker is calibrated (tweaked) before leaving Denmark to match a reference speaker. This is not possible with analog systems. It assures a that all of the speakers sound the same, a sort of quality control.
4. Digital Amplification
Each of the speakers has four digital amps; one for each driver. Somehow, by being digital Class D amps they can be smaller and run cooler than other amps. That allows them to put 4 powerful amps insider the very confined space of the speaker enclosure. The high power allows peak sound levels of 115 to 120 dB.
Thoughts and comments on any of these four technologies would be appreciated.
And, if you have heard these speakers, do you think they are for real.
In their literature the tout 4 technologies that set them apart.
I am not an audiophile (yet) but wonder what those with more experience think about these four ideas.
1. An Acoustic Lens technology
This means a much wider dispersion of high frequencies. Supposedly this makes sweet spot for listening is much larger. This means you can sit in different places or move around and still have optimal sound.
2. Adaptive Bass Control
This uses a microphone in each speaker to calibrate the low frequency interaction with the room. This permits a wider range of speaker placement. For example, one could be near a wall, or one could be near a corner and this would compensate.
3. Digital Signal Processing
Being all digital, each speaker is calibrated (tweaked) before leaving Denmark to match a reference speaker. This is not possible with analog systems. It assures a that all of the speakers sound the same, a sort of quality control.
4. Digital Amplification
Each of the speakers has four digital amps; one for each driver. Somehow, by being digital Class D amps they can be smaller and run cooler than other amps. That allows them to put 4 powerful amps insider the very confined space of the speaker enclosure. The high power allows peak sound levels of 115 to 120 dB.
Thoughts and comments on any of these four technologies would be appreciated.
And, if you have heard these speakers, do you think they are for real.
- ...
- 62 posts total
Hdomke, People have their own definitions, but IMHO an audiophile is a hardware hobbyist. You needn't ever swap out gear, but if you meet the definition of "audiophile", you're always thinking about it at some level. If that's not you - Don't call yourself an audiophile! (and certainly don't feel slighted) The Beolab looks very interesting, but for much less cah you can implement full spectrum deqx processing/digital X-over with any # of speakers featuring the dispersion pattern of your choice. The packaging will probably be less slick than the B&O and the set-up more labor intensive, but the results should meet or surpass the Beo-Lab for most (though probably not all) ears. Good Luck, Marty |
Shadorn, the Beolab looks like it came from Forbidden PlanetI agree that it looks odd, but I'm okay with that. I am pleased that they are relatively small for their capability and the fact that there may be more freedom in room placement due to the adaptive bass control and acoustic lens technology. Since you listen to music as a background thing then it may well be the correct choice.I think these speakers would be overkill for background music. I'm looking forward to becoming an Active Listener The Wilson's may not elicit automatic comments from guests but they are a more conventional tried and proven box speaker designI'm not trying to impress guests with the looks of the speakers. I live on a farm in the middle of the Missouri and I don't have many guests. But my wife and I care what the listening room (read: Living Room) looks like. The Wilson's (at least the Sophia's and the WATT Pupplies) are quite a bit bigger than the Beolab 5's and with room placement issues, I think they actually might dominate the room more. However, having auditioned the Wilson Sophia speakers last week I have to say I was deeply impressed - the best I have ever heard. When I audition the Beolab 5 speakers if they are not at least as good at the Wilson Sophia's then I won't get them. |
Hdomke, I've been reading and posting these forums for a number of years and I've come to the conclusion that for many audiophiles swapping equipment frequently is normal and expected behavior. They think of it in terms of "upgrading", but to a large extent I believe they just want to change something for change sake. Nothing particularly right or wrong with that. Music lovers, musicians and others just don't seem to have that constant need to change things. B&O is nothing like Bose. A better comparison is Meridian. If it were me, I'd take the Beolab over the Wilson any day, but YMMV. |
I'll second Onhwy61's recommendation. Wilson doesn't have and cannot match B&O's technological resources. The fact that one company has buddied up with the reviewing community and the other one has not makes for a higher audiophile profile but not necessarily a better product. When I heard the Beolab 5, I was very impressed and would have bought them if I had had the money at that time. Bear in mind that many of the comments you read on here are the AMEN CHORUS from Stereophile, etc. |
- 62 posts total