2. speakers
  3. 1198369753

Beolab 5 - Four Questionable Technologies

I'm looking to buy a high-end speaker system and have become enamored by the Beolab 5 Powered Speakers by B&O.

In their literature the tout 4 technologies that set them apart.
I am not an audiophile (yet) but wonder what those with more experience think about these four ideas.

1. An Acoustic Lens technology
This means a much wider dispersion of high frequencies. Supposedly this makes sweet spot for listening is much larger. This means you can sit in different places or move around and still have optimal sound.

2. Adaptive Bass Control
This uses a microphone in each speaker to calibrate the low frequency interaction with the room. This permits a wider range of speaker placement. For example, one could be near a wall, or one could be near a corner and this would compensate.

3. Digital Signal Processing
Being all digital, each speaker is calibrated (tweaked) before leaving Denmark to match a reference speaker. This is not possible with analog systems. It assures a that all of the speakers sound the same, a sort of quality control.

4. Digital Amplification
Each of the speakers has four digital amps; one for each driver. Somehow, by being digital Class D amps they can be smaller and run cooler than other amps. That allows them to put 4 powerful amps insider the very confined space of the speaker enclosure. The high power allows peak sound levels of 115 to 120 dB.

Thoughts and comments on any of these four technologies would be appreciated.

And, if you have heard these speakers, do you think they are for real.
hdomke
mount_rose_music's avatar
mount_rose_music
116 posts
 
I just noticed I was asked questions on your post.

1. I question that review, only because that particular mag never ever in my experience recommends something that expensive, and it is clear the author had a prior thing going on the design of the Beolab. But I question it mainly because they never,ever never recommend anything that expensive in that magazine, but then again, it may be that good. So I don't disregard it, it just strikes me as very strange.

2. I have no idea about the reviewer, except I generally believe most reviewers try to do a good job and he seemed fairly technically knowledgeable during the review.

And I LIKE omnis, because you are not nailed to a sweetspot ...and no matter what anybody says, the omnis I have measured have better dispersion than any box speaker I have measured, by a fair amount. It is a tradeoff if you are not sitting in an exact spot, which, I agree, will tend to be the absolute best measured place if a room is done right. The question is, do you want a solitary hobby or one you share... do you want to sit in more than one spot? If so, omni, if no... box.

Cheers!
Chris
hdomke OP
40 posts
 
Well, I have picked my speakers, and they are not the Beolab 5s.
I love the idea of the B&O speakers, but on careful listening, I have to say that the B&W 800D speakers appeal to me more.

Granted, with proper amplification they are about twice the price of B&Os Beolab 5 speakers. But they are more appealing to me. I've already ordered them.

But in time if B&O stays with their innovative thinking I think they will get it right.
csommovigo
35 posts
 
Shadhorn,

You state:
" I do not like omnidirectional or dipoles or forward and rear radiating panels or ribbon speakers for the very reasons you give about the reverberation they create. It creates ambience at the expense of imaging and soudstage and clarity."

This is actually NOT the case with German Physiks - makers of the only full-range, single-element point-source omni driver. That is what really enamored me of the brand and why I took on the US distribution. UltraAudio just reviewed the HRS-120 model from GP, with Jeff Fritz observing:

They produced the most expansive, most three-dimensional soundstage I’ve yet heard in my room.
The sound was melt-the-walls-away wide and deep. The result was that the speakers truly "disappeared" from the music, leaving behind only some of the most beautiful sound I’ve ever heard.
The HRS 120s kept a stable image even when I listened a couple of feet or more off axis.
What I instead heard was bass that was reasonably extended ... with good speed and integration.
The HRS 120s could flat-out rock when called on to do so.
Germans Physiks loudspeakers have something unique: their sound. The Dick Dipole Driver, now virtually perfected, has been put to good use in the HRS 120, where it produces a sound that is quite marvelous -- I loved listening to these speakers.
You might just fall in love with them. If you do, I can just about guarantee that you’ll be the first on your block to have a set, and that your audiophile friends will gawk in amazement when they first hear them.

In my mind, the DDD driver is the most technically accomplished omni driver design extant. It is a "have your cake and eat it too" proposition, providing huge soundstaging, as well as proper and lifelike imaging. So far my experience has been that GP speakers are the only direct-radiating omnis to accomplish this feat.

(no - it is not just a present-day Walsh driver. Check out the DDD technology page on German Physiks' web site for the background:
DDD TECHNOLOGY

German Physiks speakers are probably the more expensive omni options out there, but they are invariably also the most highly accomplished.

Cheers!

Chris
More to discover