Bryston 3B ST vs NAD C 355BEE


Hey everyone! I've recently moved and my system has undergone a bit of downsizing and overhaul.

I swapped out my Bryston 7B SST2's and Axiom M80's for a NAD C 355BEE and a pair of Monitor Audio Silver RX6's. My preamp is still a Bryston BP25 and I only use the NAD as a power amp.

The new rig sounds excellent. Warm, detailed, coherent and lots of low end. I'm considering swapping the NAD with a Bryston 3B ST to lower the noise floor, tighten up the bass response and improve dynamics but I'm not sure if it will be as warm and coherent as the NAD.

Would anyone who is familiar with NAD and Bryston products care to weigh in on this one?
pontifex
I think a Class A amp could potentially be a great idea for the future. Clayton Audio and Plinius are two others you may want to put on your radar. Best of luck.
Pontifex-

the Bryston is excellent for sheer power. Think about Plinius and/or Pass labs. These all are excellent to outstanding power amps, synergy will be key here.

More importantly, which cables/cords are you using(or plan to use)? Keep me posted & Happy Listening!
I would say the Bryston would run rings around the NAD, but maybe not. I would take the Bryston because of the greater reliability, warranty (regardless if you're paying for it or not)and power output. However, it's hard to say without hearing both.

Nad and Rotel are not in the same league as Bryston!  They are good for the price, that`s it.