speakers for classical music

Also, the old saw that high powered SS amps don't have a good "first watt" is no longer true in all cases. Jeff Rowland contends that you could never ignore the first watt and that you always needed linearity in all operating conditions. Yes, there'd be tons of unused power if you hooked up a 500 watt Rowland Continuum to a speaker requiring flea-watts, but it'd sound good.

Dave

Hi Dave, my only concern would be a very steep volume up/down. If a pre were to increase volume only by small fractions of a Db per step, even a muscular amp may work on some high efficiency speakers. . . actually Capri pre comes to mind, doesn't it have 0.1Db steps when turning the volume knob slowly? AN what about your Continuum 500?

G.

Again I agree with dave here. I have tried the Avantgarde Unos with some pretty powerful SS amps including a Halcro DM38. Most impressive.

If you spoke to Avantgarde themselves you will find they wont recommend tubes, in fact they make their own SS amp. Orpheus amps work very well too.

The Continuum is .5dB per attenuator step (I think that the Capri is also), but it takes a setting over 30 to start rising above the abient noise with my speakers rated in the 90-93dB sensitivity range.

I generally listen from a setting as low as 50 (reading by myself, sitting close to the speaker with low ambiant noise) and as high as 79.5 or even just over 80 (trying to knock myself out of the listening position with MTT's excellent Mahler 6th). With a super efficient speaker I suspect that I'd listen around 20 and my upper range might be 29 (BTW, those are step setting readings, not dB). I still think that the loudness refinement would be granular enough, but you'd definitely want to try.

Surely, no one owning horns is going to go buy a Continuum 500, but if you already had one laying around, then it might actually work pretty well.

Dave

Dcstep, until you have heard all the tube amps in the world its hard to say that they all sound the same isn't it? That was all I was trying to get across, not that tubes are inherently superior.

Of course I do believe in what I am doing. Making tube amps for a living is not the easiest way to make a buck- I don't do this for the money, I do it because I like it.

I also am convinced that someday it will be possible to do as well with solid state what I am able to do with tubes. The access to this is understanding the rules of human hearing and creating a solid state amplifier that obeys those rules. Right now there might one or two solid state amplifiers that are really successful with that. Both of them have limited power, the biggest being the Ridley Audio amp which makes 100 watts.

So- making really musical power is hard. So if you want to reproduce classical, which has the widest dynamic range of any musical form (generally speaking), you need a speaker that will be easy to drive. 20db BTW is a 100:1 difference in power.

The CAR is all of that and with a 60 watt amp you will not need a subwoofer and in most rooms you will not be able to clip the amp either. Plus it is as revealing as anything out there including the best ESLs, so if anyone wonders why they should care? -that's why. I own them but I don't sell them.

If your speaker is only 90 db, you will not be able to reproduce an orchestra at life-like levels. A live orchestra can reach 115db peaks BTW. Most speakers and electronics would be too oppressive at those levels to be tolerable, and the vast majority would be lucky to get within 10db. Most people are happy with 95db; imagine not ever having to think about even coming close to clipping the amp. Taking advantage of tubes' softer clipping is not a good idea in audio, although that works great for electric guitars!

I don't think tube vs transistor discussions are useful because I have come to understand that the conversation is never about that. Take a look again at the link that Duke and I posted earlier, yes its on my website, no, its not actually some sort of marketing thing, its simply the way audio has turned out. Astute readers will see that it generates an access to making a solid state amp that conforms to the rules of human hearing as well as tubes; the discussion of tubes/transistors is the same as objectivist/subjectivist.