>01-12-10: Rsfphil
The way I understand it is given the same sensitivity the amp would have to double down into 4 ohms for the 4 ohm speaker to play as loud as the 8 ohm speaker. The MA6500 almost gets there so it would be very close. I doubt if anyone would even notice.
If the speakers had the same _efficiency_ that would be the case although most speakers are rated using _sensitivity_.
A 90dB/2.83V/1 meter speaker will play 90dB measured a meter away with a 2.83V RMS (4V peak sine wave) input regardless of its load impedance.
That will take 1W into 8 Ohms or 2W into 4 Ohms.
A 90dB/1W/1 meter efficient speaker has 90dB/2.83V/1 meter sensitivity with an 8 Ohm nominal impedance and 87dB/2.83V/1 meter sensitivity when the impedance is 4 Ohms.
Sensitivity is the relevant number unless output transformers with different taps get involved, since music which doesn't make your ears hurt from the volume has average power so far below the peaks you're just looking to keep those from clipping.
The way I understand it is given the same sensitivity the amp would have to double down into 4 ohms for the 4 ohm speaker to play as loud as the 8 ohm speaker. The MA6500 almost gets there so it would be very close. I doubt if anyone would even notice.
If the speakers had the same _efficiency_ that would be the case although most speakers are rated using _sensitivity_.
A 90dB/2.83V/1 meter speaker will play 90dB measured a meter away with a 2.83V RMS (4V peak sine wave) input regardless of its load impedance.
That will take 1W into 8 Ohms or 2W into 4 Ohms.
A 90dB/1W/1 meter efficient speaker has 90dB/2.83V/1 meter sensitivity with an 8 Ohm nominal impedance and 87dB/2.83V/1 meter sensitivity when the impedance is 4 Ohms.
Sensitivity is the relevant number unless output transformers with different taps get involved, since music which doesn't make your ears hurt from the volume has average power so far below the peaks you're just looking to keep those from clipping.