Moving from the Magnepan 3.6 to the 20.1


I've been enjoying my Magnepan 3.6's immensely since I picked up a used pair about six months ago. This has got me wondering just how good the 20.1's could really be. My room is probably large enough for the 20.1's; it's 17.5w x 26L x 9h.

Unfortunately my local dealer doesn't stock the 20'1's so I don't have easy access to a pair for serious auditioning.

Have you made this move? How much 'better' are the 20.1's than the 3.6's? Were they better? What stood-out between the two?
stickman451
I would pick up a new amp first, before you buy the 20.1's, you will need it to dry the 20.1's anyway.

Many amps would be upgrades: the Cary's you mention which I have and love, Parasound Halo JC-1's (great), varios Sanders Sound (or older Innersound ESL amps), the Wyred4Sounds, Spectron (not my fav, but lots of folks love), the Bel Canto Ref1000's, big Pass or Classe are always great, well, they are just great period.

I don't like the McIntosh amp sound with Maggies, just my taste.

That all said, and I also own the 3.6R's, I think the 20.1's not only have more bass, but are top to bottom more coherent, have great seperation of instruments, and a bigger soundstage.

In my opinion, and it's worth what's being paid for it, I think the 20.1 is the best speaker I have ever heard, period.

Get the amp first, that may improve the sound enough for you to wait, but by all means, move up if you wish. I think I may do the same thing next year.
Another option is adding a subwoofer. I know that some here will not be receptive to this idea, but I've had more than a little success with my Maggie+subwoofer set-up (at least for my taste).

I used to own 3.5s and currently own the little MMG, which I sometimes use with 2 Rythmik subs and a Velodyne SMS-1 controller (which optimizes sub/main integration and room corrects the bass response from the subs). I also use an NHT active x-over to roll off the bass on the MMGs (the SMS is NOT in the main signal path). Overall I prefer the current SMG + subs to my old 3.5s and suspect that 3.6s with DRC subs might make a formidable combo.

Just one more option to consider.

Marty
MacdadTexas,

do the Cary 500 MB's ever seem to run out of steam driving your 3.6's? What do you like the most about them? Did you compare them against other high-power amps before you purchased them?
Don_c55,

You have an interesting point about the midrange on the 3.6 vs 20.1s. I honestly like the mids better on the 3.6 for lack of a technical reason. I just keep my comments to myself though because I have only heard each of these speakers for a few hours.

Can you give us anymore details on why you feel the 3.6s midrange is better in sonic terms? I felt the 3.6s had more midrange energy and life but I could not put my finger on it. I needed a longer demo I guess.
May I know where I can read more on the DRC subs? In particular why would the synergy with 3.6.