2. digital
  3. 1398132150

Absolute top tier DAC for standard res Redbook CD

Hi All.

Putting together a reference level system.
My Source is predominantly standard 16/44 played from a MacMini using iTunes and Amarra. Some of my music is purchased from iTunes and the rest is ripped from standard CD's.
For my tastes in music, my high def catalogues are still limited; so Redbook 16/44 will be my primary source for quite some time.

I'm not spending DCS or MSB money. But $15-20k retail is not out of the question.

Upsampling vs non-upsampling?
USB input vs SPDIF?

All opinions welcome.

And I know I need to hear them, but getting these ultra $$$ DAC's into your house for an audition ain't easy.

Looking for musical, emotional, engaging, accurate , with great dimension. Not looking for analytical and sterile.
mattnshilp
georgehifi's avatar
georgehifi
10,312 posts
 

10-31-15: Mattnshilp
George's techno babble was great, I enjoyed that actually. But his incessant ranting about there only being ONE and ONLY ONE way to convert digital to analog

Seeing you bought my name into it AGAIN, there is only one best way to convert your thread title the BEST WAY, and that with a R2R Multibit dac conversion, properly implemented.
"Absolute top tier DAC for standard res Redbook CD"
Not with Delta Sigma based dacs which are good for doing DSD


One day when you voodooist get some proper knowledge and understand the "techno babble" you will realize this, one can only live in hope.

The reason this thread has so many hits it because of the title, hitters want to know about the best Redbook replay.
Not as Agear pointed out, the voodoo junk you guys go on about.

No Cheer George
mattnshilp OP
917 posts
 
And that, Agear, is why we shut him down......

Because a one horse pony show gets boring very quickly. Especially when only Palomino's are allowed to compete.
mattnshilp OP
917 posts
 
What are opinions on the new DCS line? Rossini? Looks like a DAC, transport, renderer and up converter in one box. Only leaves the external clock as a separate component.... A simplified Vivaldi.
mattnshilp OP
917 posts
 
Guido - in your wonderfully eloquent way, please provide us with your definition of "analog" sound. So many equate warm and analog and in my opinion they are very different.
cerrot's avatar
cerrot
1,700 posts
 
Not necessarilly, audiolabyrinth. Heres my take. I truly believe that when you put the proper system together, there are no words to describe what you hear (or, what you experience), just the emotion it makes you feel. My very neutral stseym portrays rich recordings richly and warm recordsings warmly...but I don't hear warmth or richness but its the way my mind and body respond to what I hear.
More to discover