2. amps-preamps
  3. 1447363377

Advice re the use of OTL amps vs others

In my recent transition from solid state to vacuum tube amplification I'm learning a little about the various types of circuitry designs available. I'm currently using the Cary Rocket 88R amp mostly in Triode mode, and Peachtree Audio Nova as a preamp. The warmth I gained is extremely satisfying but I'm not sure if this is attributable specifically to the Rocket or simply as a result of transitioning to this setup vs solid state Peachtree to Martin Logan ESL's.

I'm impressed with what I hear about the Atmasphere amps and would like to consider them but have some concerns. What I've read is that the OTL amplifiers supposedly present the best of both worlds between a solid state and valve amp sound. In one way of thinking, using the Peachtree pre and the Rocket amp, I have somewhat the same thing now. I know it's not that simple but that's why this thread. I'm not concerned about overall sound quality with the right OTL but am that I might loose some of the warmth or "roundness?" I've found with the Cary.

Therein lies the question. I have no way that I know of to locally (33064) audition the Atmasphere S30 which is the one I'm leaning toward based on my research so far. The speakers which I'm now using and intend to keep are the original Reference 3A MMC Serie having an efficiency rating of approx 85dB and 8 ohms impedance.
broadstone
almarg's avatar
almarg
9,670 posts
 
Hi Unsound,

Yes, I for one would agree with your disagreement with that statement. While my own preferences have evolved such that I favor tube amplification and speakers having benign impedance characteristics, it seems abundantly clear that many audiophiles have assembled very fine systems with opposite approaches.

As is usual in audio, a multitude of different approaches can each provide good results, bad results, or results at various points in between, depending on many factors.

Best regards,
-- Al
tubegroover
2,320 posts
 
Whatever "accurate" is eh Unsound? I too love the Sonus Faber "Extrema" and Apogee Scintillas as examples but that "nebulous" of terms "accurate" as applicable to an audio system is well....nebulous, which is to say, seems like an accurate way of describing it, at least to me. I only find accurate in the concert hall and would have to trust the mixing engineer to tell me that a given monitor is accurate in reproducing what he hears in a recording studio. Some are better than others so who do you trust? You can only trust what you hear. Hearing is unique among the senses in that we all perceive and value things differently and most importantly those values, judgements and perceptions more often than not can't be measured. So what we're left with is reconciliation of the measurements with what we hear. Better to keep it simple to my way of thinking, I personally don't want to be limited to a speaker design that is limited to amplifier choices because of its electrical characteristics which isn't to say it may be viable for others.
unsound
7,371 posts
 
^IMHO, this is an example of what accurate is (at least by current standards):
http://www.stereophile.com/content/dunlavy-audio-labs-signature-sc-vi-loudspeaker-specifications
http://www.stereophile.com/content/dunlavy-audio-labs-signature-sc-vi-loudspeaker-measurements
http://www.stereophile.com/content/dunlavy-audio-labs-signature-sc-vi-loudspeaker-measurements-part-2

One could also take the other view; that choosing some particular amplifiers disqualifies some speaker choices. I am of the opinion that it is better to choose amplification for speakers rather than speakers for amplification.
bifwynne
2,206 posts
 
Wow!! Unsound. I never heard Dunlavy speakers, but on paper they are quite impressive. Are they time coherent? If so, add them to the short list of 3 or so other brands that are.
csontos
1,311 posts
 
Potentially accurate. If the speakers were perfect, what would you be listening to?
More to discover