@Roxy, sorry to be round the bush:
I love the VSM's for what they do: However, let me relate a story that happened to me, and describes the "but" you might encounter with earlier generations of VSM's:
A Studio engineer comes in and listens to them, his first reaction is: aren'they rather lightweight? (happened once) I then explained, that these are actually extended monitors with an added Bam module - that same engineer stayed a whole afternoon and was smitten in the end declaring that he no longer missed what there wasn't there, because of the quality of the rest. Does that clarify the but?
As to the TSM Master, this first reaction of doubt will simply not happen - to big is the discrepancy between size and sound.
Just yesterday, when I finished my review, I felt it was a bit little meat on the bone, so I would like to describe in depth the change from the Sonus Faber Guarneri to the VSM MXe and now to the Master TSM:
I felt the Guarneris had the most wonderful colours i had ever encountered in speakers, especially concerning vowels. If it was a tad polite, it got much better when i paired them with the Berning ZH270 (Remember Franco Serblin uses the Berning as a reference as well).
Then I stumbled over very early Merlins, and was absolutely smitten by their clarity, even though i could appreciate the fullness of the Guarneri - Only when listening to the newer generation i suddenly realised that I had been missing a whole lot of information in consonants; so I changed brands (slightly reluctantly, as the Guarneris are so beautiful).
The Master TSM actually seems to pronounce both abilities, the singing of the Guarneri and the speaking of the VSM.
I don't know what they have done at Merlin, as I never felt like this about the TSM MMe, which I considered a very useful but somewhat utilitarian loudspeaker.
Hope this clarifies my discrete writing ;-)
I love the VSM's for what they do: However, let me relate a story that happened to me, and describes the "but" you might encounter with earlier generations of VSM's:
A Studio engineer comes in and listens to them, his first reaction is: aren'they rather lightweight? (happened once) I then explained, that these are actually extended monitors with an added Bam module - that same engineer stayed a whole afternoon and was smitten in the end declaring that he no longer missed what there wasn't there, because of the quality of the rest. Does that clarify the but?
As to the TSM Master, this first reaction of doubt will simply not happen - to big is the discrepancy between size and sound.
Just yesterday, when I finished my review, I felt it was a bit little meat on the bone, so I would like to describe in depth the change from the Sonus Faber Guarneri to the VSM MXe and now to the Master TSM:
I felt the Guarneris had the most wonderful colours i had ever encountered in speakers, especially concerning vowels. If it was a tad polite, it got much better when i paired them with the Berning ZH270 (Remember Franco Serblin uses the Berning as a reference as well).
Then I stumbled over very early Merlins, and was absolutely smitten by their clarity, even though i could appreciate the fullness of the Guarneri - Only when listening to the newer generation i suddenly realised that I had been missing a whole lot of information in consonants; so I changed brands (slightly reluctantly, as the Guarneris are so beautiful).
The Master TSM actually seems to pronounce both abilities, the singing of the Guarneri and the speaking of the VSM.
I don't know what they have done at Merlin, as I never felt like this about the TSM MMe, which I considered a very useful but somewhat utilitarian loudspeaker.
Hope this clarifies my discrete writing ;-)