Tannoy vs. ATC


I'm looking at ATC SCM40 vs. Tannoy Kensington. Two very different speakers, I know. No.1, I need a speaker that can be placed close to the wall (less than 3 feet). I think both apply there (I didn't say it was ideal). Among other things, I like the Tannoy because I have a 40 w/ch tube amp, and the Tannoy is more "child friendly" (as far as tipping over and access to delicate drivers). The amps also have sentimental value and I would like to use them. If I buy the ATC I have to get other amplification, which I am willing to do because I love what they do (leave the child friendly part to me on this one...!). So, with the 40w/ch tube amp and the Tannoy (which may still require more power), or the ATC with 'competent' SS amplification (TBD), any recommendations on the two? Amps are vintage (and fully functional/restored) McIntosh, currently running Klipsch Chorus speakers (my temporary compromise to allow for Children...hard to push over or destroy!..which actually sound pretty good by the way, just not much in the way of imaging or accurate bass). I have NEVER heard Tannoy Prestige series, but I am going out on a limb based on all the web and print-based anecdotal evidence. Third choice - hold out for Canterbury? Also a factor in the decision, eventually I will be able to use more of the room for placement. My room is 20 x 13 feet. As far as preferences, I like heavy classical music, as well as softer music - classical guitar, choral, etc. (and listenability at low volume is important too). I have found that I do prefer accurate loudspeakers in general, and accurate bass is very important to me (organ music is a staple). I am willing to use a subwoofer. I'm hoping someone might have experience with a lot of this gear. Thanks. 
jimmy2615
I'd go Tannoy and keep the Tubes; more musical to these ears. And if you don't have to replace amp, perhaps Canterbury become doable?
Thanks for the responses.  MapleGrove, I would be buying the new SCM40 V2 from my dealer, so you can have the used!  (Although I have to say I think the original SCM40 with the black face look just fine, and now a great bargain used).  Shadorne, yes, the actives are an option, for sure.  If I choose the ATCs I will consider the passive version vs. the active.   
I should add for posterity, if I chose the actives I would still have to buy a new preamp with balanced outputs to connect to the speakers.  Vintage McIntosh have RCA only.  Also, active speakers have power chords, so you have to consider additional power chords and available wall outlets (or extensions) with regard to speaker placement.  Still they are a great option.
" The amps also have sentimental value and I would like to use them." as far as I am concerned this is your answer...


A wonderful aspect of ATC is how faithfully they reproduce what has been recorded on the media.  This can be amazing with excellent recordings but horrible on poorly recorded ones.  They are very clear, resolving and tonally neutral.  I've owned the 20-2's and the SCM-11's.  I currently own the SCM-19's.  The bass for the size has slam and is very detailed. They do require powerful amplification.  Many don't like ATC because they are too revealing.
On the other hand Tannoy are not as "fast" are more mellow sounding and less detailed.  With good tubes they produce a warm blanket of sound which many people like.  I own the Glenair 15's and once owned the Turnberry's.  

Based on your listening preferences I would recommend the Tannoy's.

                                                                      Jim