2. amps-preamps
  3. 1371603241

Anyone have/ordered the Job 225?

There's almost no consumer impressions of this amp on the internet... but the 6moons review is intriguing.
girlsgeneration
grannyring's avatar
grannyring
6,518 posts
 
Thank you very much srosenberg as this is a mighty fine idea. I was thinking of just using Rothwell attenuators, but they may degrade the sound? I have not used the Rothwells before. I love this little amp. Best value in high end along with the Lightspeed attenuator.
grannyring's avatar
grannyring
6,518 posts
 
Seems the Rothwells do change the sound in some not so great ways. Great LSA idea. 
georgehifi's avatar
georgehifi
10,312 posts
 

It’s not that the Rothwell’s themselves can "change the sound in not such a great way"

But what the Rothwell’s can do is change the perceived impedance as seen by the previous stage, as then not to have a good impedance match. This can mainly happen with a tube or passive preamps, most solid state preamps should not have this problem

Cheers George

srosenberg's avatar
srosenberg
209 posts
 
@grannyring 
i haven't used the Rothwells personally but have heard that they aren't the last word in transparency.  I can say that the LDR pre in my application was completely transparent, and enabled me to perfectly dial in the amount of attenuation needed, unlike the fixed in line units, such as the Rothwell.
georgehifi's avatar
georgehifi
10,312 posts
 

I’m sure if you used two of my or any passive pre’s in series the sound would be crap as well without using the Rothwell’s.

I'm sure the Rothwell will be fine on the input of a high input impedance (>47kohm?) poweramp, if the pre before it had a low output impedance of below say <50 or a 100ohms.


Cheers George

More to discover