I think I've Just Seen Absolute Proof That Audiophiles Are Insanely Gullible


I didn’t want to crap on someone’s sales thread, so I thought i’d post my amazement here. The focus of my disbelief? The "Dalby D7-Vinyl Stabilizer," which is a damn weight that screws onto the turntable spindle to hold the record securely onto the platter. Listed retail? 4000 British Pounds! (although a mag listed it at $6,800! On sale here at AudioGullible for the bargain basement price of 2500 British Pounds, or $3600 US dollars!!! Just read a few snippets of the sales ad . . .

"The D7-Vinyl Stabiliser has a sonic character that brings music to life and the ability to elevate the entire audio frequency from the veil and mechanics inherent in prerecorded music. The gains are immediate, with sweeter high frequency extension while the mid and lower registers are beautifully controlled. The soundscape is wider, higher and deeper, allowing the music to breathe more naturally."

I’m sorry, but I’m calling total BS on this. A friggin’ weight brings "music to life," "sweeter high frequency extension," "allowing the music to breathe more naturally . ." Come on. Its a modified paperweight that screws onto the platter. One can only imagine what this guy thinks about some $20K interconnects for the turntable -- the music probably writes itself! And don’t forget the amazing improvement that a $4,000 carbon fiber mat might add . . . You probably would think you were hallucinating because the music breathed so much it was oozing out of the speakers, like on some of my more memorable nights in college in the ’70’s.

Now I have never heard this amazing gift to the audiophile community, so maybe it is the audio equivalent of the Second Coming, but really? $5,800 for this? It confirms to me that there is a certain insanity/gullibility/too much money/snake oil in this so-called "hobby," (which is a hobby to customers and ridiculous business for some manufacturers). When is enough enough? What about audiophile paint, that has amazing sonic qualities to cut down reflection and make the soundstage so wide that you feel you need a new apartment? Don’t forget the audiophile couch, that is sonically neutral but promises to position your ears to "bring music to life?" OK, I’ve made my point. No offense to the seller of the snake oil, but really . . . When is enough enough?

This concludes my rant for today. :)
moto_man
Moto, why did it take the Dalby piece for you you to have this revelation about "high end" audio?  Depending on your perspective, there are endless examples of tomfoolery.  

BTW, I have friends who own this clamp after fiddling with many others and swear by it.  They are all vinyl nuts and have uber $$$ systems as expected.

Moto, what does your system consist of and what personal examples of tomfoolery can you share?
jmcgrogan2,

Funny when you say:

A simple survey....how many of you guys are married?
I rest my case. ;^)
What's wrong with marriage? Its about finding the right one. More to life than internet porn.
So many questions, so little time, LOL!
@tostadosunidos , I sense a DSOTM fan .. . . :)  The "holy grail" of DSOTM refers to the 1983 Japanese 1st pressing of DSOTM (matrix CP35-3017 on the CD itself) and also referred to as the "Black Triangle" version.  It was the first CD pressing of DSOTM from the master and is not only very rare (in real CD form) but reputed to be the best sounding recording.  However, as I indicated above, In the Steve Hoffman music forum, you can see the blind listening clips and results.  The differences are not huge between the many versions, but I preferred the Sony Mastersound version.  PM me if you want a copy.

@geoffkait , I respectfully disagree.  It's not extrapolating one data point, which even then is subjective.  It is discarding all of the nonsense reviews by "reviewers" and owners, and rely on tests that cannot be colored by preconceived expectations.  I am not saying that all participants in a double-blind listen will have the same conclusion, but they should.  So to me its not throwing out all of the other data as much as recognizing that some reviewer raving about how a record clamp makes all the difference in the world is BS.  This data points should be discarded.  Now, in a double-blind study, someone legitimately reached the same result, don't you agree that that would have significantly more validity?  Plus, the witches' dunking chairs were supposed to be objectively verifiable tests.  You float, you're a witch.  You sink, their bad. . .  guess you weren't a witch!  Based on a faulty premise, sure, but still objectively verifiable. :)

@agear , I peruse AudioGon all the time.  I am always surprised at some the enormously priced cables, interconnects and equipment.  However, I do know that cables sound different, and equipment sounds different -- maybe not $20K better than a $1K cable, but who knows.  But sometimes, claims are made which literally leap out at me and cry for comment because of the claims vs. cost vs the product.  If the Dalby was $700 or $1000, I wouldn't have blinked.  But $5600 US for a record clamp with the overblown claims in the ad . . . As I said before, enough is enough.  I'm not sure if you were joking about friends having them and "swearing by them," but it again proves my point that once you're committed to a purchase, it becomes fabulous and you buy into the claims.  But in a double-blind test . ..  Highly different result, I suspect.

@magnum44 , LOL! I have all of my LPs digitized and on a server.  My LP's are in storage, for that day when first editions of various LP's in mint condition become too valuable to not sell!  Not on point for this snake oil thread, but I wonder if you take a high quality rig, put an LP on and digitize it into a lossless format, shouldn't the "warm analog sound" be captured into the digital file?