DIGITAL OUT: Optical Cable vs. Coaxial Cable

Of course I suppose there can be variations in 75ohm interface quality too. For instance, my friend Larry thinks coax is best, but ONLY if it employs BNC (bayonet) connectors (as opposed to RCA connectors.)

That would be highly system dependent, as it would be dependent on the jitter reduction capabilities of the dac (if any), the risetime and falltime of the output signal from the transport or other digital source, the degree of impedance mismatch between cable, connectors, and interface circuits at both ends, and the length of the cable (which affects the timing of reflections and re-reflections caused by impedance mismatch; 1.5 meters is generally considered optimal, shorter than that non-optimal).

See this paper: http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue14/spdif.htm

And this and other threads here at Audiogon: http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?ddgtl&1237611683

Given these kinds of system dependencies, and others which most likely exist in the case of optical connections, I think it stands to reason that experiences and opinions will differ on the op's question.

Regards,
-- Al

When I referred to "variations in the 75ohm interface" I meant variations in the ability of different types of connectors to maintain the integrity of the RF signal across the interface; and not the quality of construction. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

There was no misunderstanding to be sorry for, Neil, at least as far as I am concerned. :)

I assumed that you were referring to impedance matching and maintaining waveform quality (so as to minimize jitter), and that is what I was responding to.

Best,
-- Al

I found the Wireworld SuperNova 5+ to be as good as very good SPDIF in my old rig. I do like the electrical isolation Toslink provides - I think it makes an important difference.

The other point is strictly practical - you can get a 3m Wireworld for the same or less as a good (but not insanely great) 1m SPDIF.

Al makes a good point. It is gear dependent. I use a Benchmark DAC1 partly because the claims by the manufacturer and most reviewers have indicated that it minimizes any jitter interface issues. Interface jitter is a problem but the right gear can eliminate the cable uncertainty issue. I have said this before - blame the equipment or the combination but not the cables.

Has anyone seen this Monster Cable Commercial?

Doesn't anyone get the suspicion that there are huge margins in audio cables and huge sponsorships (like sports gear)?

After all, cables are all made by cable manufacturers and not audio cable companies (who just place bulk orders to ordinary cable manufacturers).

Anyone get the idea that the magazine advertising revenues from audio cable companies might be huge?

I am rather suspicious of the justification for $1000's worth of cables. I suspect many reviews have a vested interest in maintaining the market for high priced cables and the advertising revenue it brings in.

But hey, I'm just a dumb engineer with tin ears...