Similar sound characteractics to MIT cables?

@dave_b What AQ cables did you compare to MIT? I'm also an AQ user (Cooper Cables) and now after reading this thread I'm curious about MIT.  

Colorado...although I did have a listen to the WEL cables as well.  I should also mention the I have tried, owned or Demo'd at home many various cables/designs over the years.  MIT's Magnum and Oracle lines deliver so much more of the music to my ears that it is not even close.  Accurate tone, dynamic freedom, low level detail and a soundstage you can swim in are some of the obvious attributes.  A symphony sounds majestic and to sly correct in pitch and timbre...just thrilling while remaining organic sounding without roll off in frequencies.  Highs have weight and expression, midrange is full and full of life while the bass is simply stunning in tone and texture.

@dave_b Thanks.  Do you feel that one needs to have a complete loom of MIT (Interconnects and Speaker ) to hear the full benefit? Or if try the speaker cables first that would be sufficient? Also, compared to AQ with their DBS technology.  Do modern MIT cables/interconnects have a similar low noise floor?

Full loom preferable to obtain what I described, but if you wish to get a feel for some of what is possible then speaker interfaces are best.  Yes, very low noise floor after 2week 24/7 break in!  I use an Oracle AC2 PC on my amp and Transparent MM2 on my Cipher.  See 6 moons review of Magnum 1.3 loom...very accurate review.

And still people make the same mistakes over and over again. If you read exactly what I wrote, you know that it is not about a brand.

You still want to compare AQ against MIT. First you need to understand the properties before it makes sense to buy a brand.

People create their set by buying brands and parts. But when I ask a simple question to all these people: can you describe all the different properties of all the parts in your set?

The answer is: No.

This means that it is a big guess how the sound and stage is created. That is why I have done thousands of tests since 1998 by finding out all the different properties of each part.

This makes audio so much more effective. At the end you always will have a more complete sound with a lot more emotion. I can garantee you that every single person will choose this. I have proven this for many years now.

Colorado is as cable what is out of production for 2 years now. You need the latest cables. Because the new cables use the technique of the latest Wel.

Even the ’new’ Water is more precise than the ’old’ Colorado.

If you use AQ the right way, it will give you more different properties to use. But....the problem in audio is that people don’t know the properties, so they will not be able to use them all.

The latest Wel Signature is the best interconnect I have tested in almost 18 years of time in many aspects. The big difference with the best Oracle cables is that silver is better in timing but also reveals details which are not there with the Oracle.

With intimate acoustic recordings you also hear the big difference in ’blacklevel’ There is more space around voices and instruments and they are better papable as well.

I never auditoned any interconnect what is able to let you hear such an accurate difference in height of instruments and voices. This also effects the harmonics of 2 or more voices togheter. The latest Wild interconnect was the first interconnect were I noticed this part.

The Wel goes a lot further in this part. The Wel also let you hear more reverb details and the space of a room compared to the Oracle cables of MIT.

When you compare the individual focus of instruments and voices between the latest Wel Signature and Oracle cables the differences are huge. The presence of voices and instruments is with the Wel so much sharper and stand more loose from eachother.