Dear friends: A gentleman here posted two statements that with all respect to him makes no sense to me and if he posted it maybe is because has very good reasons about, I hope he can chime on it.
Here are those statements:
""" forget those Dynas, Ortos and ATs, that's money waist. """
money waist to whom and why?
""" Cartridge should be good enough. but it is the least significant element in analog set-up. """"
well, other than the LP the cartridge is " the source " and the music information recorded in the LP grooves depends mainly in two cartridges characteristics: cartridge self tracking habilities ( to pick-up with precision the grooves LP modulations. ) and the cartridge quality design and execute of that design for the manufacturer.
That's why we have so many cartridge choices even that's the " least " significant link in the analog rig. Maybe the cartridge designers and audiophiles are " stupid/ignorants " and do not understand that gentleman's statement.
Regards and enjoy the music,
R.
Here are those statements:
""" forget those Dynas, Ortos and ATs, that's money waist. """
money waist to whom and why?
""" Cartridge should be good enough. but it is the least significant element in analog set-up. """"
well, other than the LP the cartridge is " the source " and the music information recorded in the LP grooves depends mainly in two cartridges characteristics: cartridge self tracking habilities ( to pick-up with precision the grooves LP modulations. ) and the cartridge quality design and execute of that design for the manufacturer.
That's why we have so many cartridge choices even that's the " least " significant link in the analog rig. Maybe the cartridge designers and audiophiles are " stupid/ignorants " and do not understand that gentleman's statement.
Regards and enjoy the music,
R.