Thanks, Jim (Jea48). Note, though, that the transformer coupled outputs shown on the schematic you linked to are the digital outputs, not the analog outputs which Lowrider is using. Although that schematic is for the CD2, rather than the CD3 MkII he is using.
Regarding overload, the UV-1 doesn't appear to have an input overload point specified, but I'd be surprised if it couldn't handle 2.7 volts. And even more so given that it provides a 6 dB input attenuator. And in any event, if it were overloading I'm sure Lowrider, who is clearly a very perceptive listener, would have noticed the distortion that would have resulted.
Regarding Mr. Crump's statement, I would add that in the case of most power amplifiers, at least, one certainly does NOT want to attenuate everything above 60 Hz. As has been pointed out in past threads by Ralph/Atmasphere among several other members, since most power amplifiers draw current in narrow high amplitude spikes, rather than continuously throughout each period of the 60 Hz waveform, their AC supply needs to be provided in a manner that is not bandwidth limited below something on the order of tens of kHz. That requirement being one of the reasons upgraded power cords can often provide superior performance compared to stock power cords, for power amplifiers at least, because many of them provide significantly greater bandwidth than most stock power cords.
Also, I just Googled "inductance of Romex" and found a not necessarily authoritative post in a thread elsewhere stating that it is about 1.45 uH (micro-Henries) per foot. That is indeed high, but for run lengths that are not particularly long I suppose is probably low enough to be compatible with the kinds of bandwidths Ralph refers to, perhaps depending on the particular amplifier. While at the same time being high enough to provide significant attenuation of digital noise, which typically has a good deal of its frequency content in the MHz range and higher.
Best regards,
-- Al
Regarding overload, the UV-1 doesn't appear to have an input overload point specified, but I'd be surprised if it couldn't handle 2.7 volts. And even more so given that it provides a 6 dB input attenuator. And in any event, if it were overloading I'm sure Lowrider, who is clearly a very perceptive listener, would have noticed the distortion that would have resulted.
Regarding Mr. Crump's statement, I would add that in the case of most power amplifiers, at least, one certainly does NOT want to attenuate everything above 60 Hz. As has been pointed out in past threads by Ralph/Atmasphere among several other members, since most power amplifiers draw current in narrow high amplitude spikes, rather than continuously throughout each period of the 60 Hz waveform, their AC supply needs to be provided in a manner that is not bandwidth limited below something on the order of tens of kHz. That requirement being one of the reasons upgraded power cords can often provide superior performance compared to stock power cords, for power amplifiers at least, because many of them provide significantly greater bandwidth than most stock power cords.
Also, I just Googled "inductance of Romex" and found a not necessarily authoritative post in a thread elsewhere stating that it is about 1.45 uH (micro-Henries) per foot. That is indeed high, but for run lengths that are not particularly long I suppose is probably low enough to be compatible with the kinds of bandwidths Ralph refers to, perhaps depending on the particular amplifier. While at the same time being high enough to provide significant attenuation of digital noise, which typically has a good deal of its frequency content in the MHz range and higher.
Best regards,
-- Al