Why, it's as if just bringing up the subject of controlled blind testing is supposed to scare the fuse affectionados into submission.Don't be scared Geoff, defender of all things unexplainable. This fuse issue has been discussed ad nauseam. We have heard the science, and how the delta in the resistance offered by different fuses, or by changing the fuse direction, is miniscule, and likely less than the difference of increasing the length of your speaker cables by one inch, for example. We have heard from respected equipment designers, and others, whose dissenting opinions have been disavowed. Mostly, we have heard about the profound sonic improvement these aftermarket/boutique fuses offer to those who have replaced the previous version of such fuses with the latest version, or to those who have replaced stock fuses (aghast!) with "audiophile approved" fuses. More power to them.
If someone hears a profound improvement in their system for a cost of "only" $120....or $174, then great. My current system has 10 fuses, so I could easily spend between $1-2K replacing fuses and I would hope to hear a significant improvement for that money. I just purchased new amplifiers and if I switched back to my previous amplifier, I could tell you every time which amplifier is in the system, blindfolded or not. Why should a simple test to determine the reliability of sonic differences between fuses be so scary? Why wouldn't those spending over $100 per fuse want to know if they are really hearing a difference? Is the emperor not wearing clothes?