In my large room, the stacked Quads in ridgid solid wood stands that got them 1 foot off the floor was better.
Again, I went with the Peter Walker stacking method.
The Quad site mentions a multiple Quad in a semi circle array that the man behind SME used to prefer to a single set of Quads.
In my room, stacked Quads filled the room , while a single pair, as good as they sound, just didn't cut it.
I think most of North American audiophiles have larger rooms than the rooms the original 57's were made for in England.
If someone has a small space, then a single pair would be great, but I would still try them raised off the floor a bit.You can use simple cement blocks to try,or DIY your own wooden stands.
Also the other benefit to the wooden stand is that you can attach the Quads to the wooden stands using longer screws thru the stands and into the holes in the Quads where their side trim panels are.Again part of the Stacked benefits in the Quad site,but you can make stands for a single pair.
The sound of the panels in a secure stand is again, better in my opinion than when they are left free standing in the room.
Owners of other panel speakers ,like Maggies and Acoustats have acknowledged the benefits of securing the panels in a ridgid stand.
I found that the sound was a bit muffled, less defined when they were used with their own feet, just inches off the ground.
I also had a pair of Tannoy Ardens around the same time powered by some SET power amps from Cary and DecWare, these moved air and were also very close to the seamless sound of panels,almost as coherent.
But this still wasn't panel sound, so I went back to electrostats.I also have a dedicated HT room with Magnepan speakers.I like panels.
I wish I still had the Quads or even one pair for a small room.
They are unique,I've owned the 63, CLS11Z,and Acoustats,and even though they are all electrostats and share some similar qualities, they all sound different.