Wow! Let the record show that on 6-15-2016 at 5:26 pm EDT Geoff submitted a post that I actually agree with 100% :-)
As for the meaning of Czarivey's post to which he was responding, I'm not sure but my guess would be he was implying that a reason sonic quality should not be characterized in percentage terms is that a component of such assessments tends to be imaginary in many cases :-)
JL35, thanks very much for your comments earlier in the thread about my post that was quoted by Wattsperchannel.
Regards,
-- Al
As for the meaning of Czarivey's post to which he was responding, I'm not sure but my guess would be he was implying that a reason sonic quality should not be characterized in percentage terms is that a component of such assessments tends to be imaginary in many cases :-)
JL35, thanks very much for your comments earlier in the thread about my post that was quoted by Wattsperchannel.
Regards,
-- Al