Redbook Keeps Surprising


I was a Best Buy to get a memory card reader for my computer. Looked at the CDs and saw a few in the bargain bin that I would like to have, only a few dollars. Came home, ripped them with DB power amp, picked the best cover art. Transferred to my Aurender through the NAS and played away. WOW, impressive sound and I really enjoyed them both. I like the High Res downloads and my SACD collection but am often really impressed by good Redbook CD. It really is the music that counts. 
128x128davt
^^^ And by the way, Redbook CD's can sound fantastic when played back through a highly resolving system.

 One key is to find the recordings that were done by a recording engineer who kept his hands off of the control panel knobs and has left the reverb dial alone ... and just lets the natural sound of the recording come through. Those are the CD's that sound terrific.

So, what are we supposed to do to remain "ethical?" Are we supposed to buy fifty crappy sounding CD's until we find one that's worth keeping? And what is the "ethical" thing to do with the crappy sounding ones? Would that be to just throw them in the trash? Would it be to just accept the crappy sounding ones and  learn to live with them? 

I submit that the unethical ones are those who own the studios that produce crappy sounding digital recordings and then gouge the public for an inferior product. They have become their own worst enemy.  

Let's get it straight ... Most of the studios today are run by a bunch of bean counters who couldn't care less about the end user. For them, its all about the money, and nothing else. 

OP
+2,charelsdad; and remember that improving your AC isolation and conditioning will yield big rewards.Cheers to the 'humble' CD.
Hi bsmith,

In my system, it’s just the opposite. The ripped cd file sounds better than the cd spinning in the super heavy transport of my old Esoteric K-01. Many others in audioland have also found ripped files to sound better than cd’s.

To be fair, I have also upgraded to the new generation Esoteric N-05 dac/network player. The usb implementation in the N-05 is miles ahead of the K-01. New digital gets cheaper and better in doing wonders for redbook.

When I switch to hi-res files, the difference isn’t that dramatic.
My entire redbook collection now sounds better than ever and the good recordings sound as good as hi-res.

Jon. :)

(Ptss, we can only hope YKWYA doesn’t come forth to tell us what I already know about the chip residing in the Esoteric N-05)

bsmith






      someone explain to me why cd’s sound better to me than the file of that cd.


      I’m with you on this bbsmith, playing the original cd always to me sounds more "wholesome, natural and sweeter" compared to a ripped or even downloaded ones, which to me sound a bit "hifi" and a bit in your face, which can to me at first give the wrong impression of better dynamics. But it’s a forced squeezed in your face type of dynamic and not enveloping easy following "bigness of body" type of dynamic that the cd gives, maybe all the added conversions of the ripped/downloaded ones have more jitter involved, who knows?

      Cheers George