Any thoughts on a solid hickory platform under my tt

geoffkait,

To address  the question I had above...

You made a comment on TT Isolation thread, remarking about having things moving in several opposing direction/motions.

When I made reference to that thread, your first remark was "good catch".  You later posted "I dunno, what did I say in that thread"?

Some of us, including me who wonder, may find (your own) statements in conflict.

Once you seemed to recognize my remembering something you said, then you ask (me) what you said.

This is very confusing.

(I like your products that I've tried. I'm not bashing. I am just asking for clarity? To at once make a remark, seemingly admitting what you said in a recent thread, then asking me later, to tell you what you said in that thread is remarkable.)

astro58go
31 posts
07-03-2016 1:09pm
"To address the question I had above...

You made a comment on TT Isolation thread, remarking about having things moving in several opposing direction/motions."

Sorry, but that doesn’t help me. I post frequently on isolation threads of which there are a bunch. If I said something that you think conflicts with something else I said I’m afraid you’ll have to be a little more specific.

"When I made reference to that thread, your first remark was "good catch". You later posted "I dunno, what did I say in that thread"?"

I originally thought you were referring to a remark about why the "twist" direction for isoaltion systems is problematic. At this point in time I still don’t know what comment that has upset you.

Astro also wrote,

"Some of us, including me who wonder, may find (your own) statements in conflict."

Actually it might only be you.  :-). Just joking.

Astro also wrote,

"Once you seemed to recognize my remembering something you said, then you ask (me) what you said.

This is very confusing.

"(I like your products that I’ve tried. I’m not bashing. I am just asking for clarity? To at once make a remark, seemingly admitting what you said in a recent thread, then asking me later, to tell you what you said in that thread is remarkable.)"

OK, why don’t you post the entire comment your referring to so at least I know what in tarnation you’re referring to. I don’t actually see any reason for all the drama. If I've made some huge error or made conflicting statements I promise I'll eat a bug.

cheers,

Geoff at Machina Dynamica

Hello Oleschool,

Let’s go for it!

Your Marshall has a loudspeaker system along with the valves support so in theory your predetermined anti-vibration approach to audio reproduction should also work with stage gear as well?

Why not test the actual live dynamic which is you and your instrument. Put a pro-vibration Sistrum Platform to the real test - under both the Peavey and Marshall amplifiers.

The Peavey will surprise you and the Marshall will put you in a state where you have never been as a player. Both amps will achieve greater attack, extended decays and more sustain than you ever experienced prior. You will easily take both amps to a higher level of volume as well and will hear more of the Marshall along with a lot more of what your personal talents are actually capable of in performance - of this we are extremely confident.

Based on our experience spending quite a few years working with top musicians in both electronic and acoustic instrument mediums, the winner of the two formats can and will easily be determined by your own fingertips, gut feel and ears. Invite a few players over for testing as they too will enjoy the event.

There is no difference between stage amplification, loudspeaker s and hi-fi gear as they all function the same and relate to the same sciences of audio reproduction. The only change for this test is the source.

You will easily determine if you prefer live dynamics from high speed energy movement or isolated dead harmonics. You will no longer make decisions based on a couple of meaningless foot stomping tests, the rhetoric of some self proclaimed experts on vibration and/or shilling manufacturers who continuously propose never ending arguments and of course those people who always avoid answering direct questions on Internet forums.

If you know any cellist, upright or electric bass players who are interested in testing our products we would like to hear from them too.

One thing is for certain, you will know if anti- or the pro-vibration approach to vibration management is the finer.

We learned through our experience, you cannot fool a musician.

Call me personally or write us from our website so we can arrange the test.

Robert Maicks

Star Sound

geofflait,

It seems to me that my postings above would give you a (reason) to look back at the comments you made.

Why am I seemingly now, somehow, a person who has posted favorable results of your product, now, under scrutiny (by you) to prove what you previously said?

The proof is in the reading of (your past posts). I've posted where your remarks could easily be found and earlier you seemed to admit by you stating "good catch". It's not up to me to do more than what I've thoughtfully posted. Being a fan of your own products, you still want to make me prove what you said in the past and then make me prove how it's relevant to this discussion? When you could easily look into this yourself, instead, you choose to put some sort of, as you state, "drama" imposed by me?

As a prospective consumer of your products, this action by you, that could have been abated by you, would make me think twice about purchasing from you.

I'm out!

Nothing yet .. I still am using my classic in mdf with spikes under it . Chewing on options