Here's denouement time.
After examining my table, arm and Dynavector for 45 minutes, then 30 minutes on the phone with Dynavector's N.A. rep, my very conscientious audio guy told me the consensus is there is nothing wrong with my cartridge.
The conclusion is asserted as reasonable based upon the following:
1. Upon examination the skating, etc., problem did not reoccur;
2. The Dynavector has a "quirk" of riding very low;
3. It is likely the cueing mechanism on the Rega arm might have been "caught" so as to effect the weight/pressure improperly, causing the problem.
No question it sounds fine right now, so I'll try and keep the faith. But I still wish I had opted for an Ortofon. An MC 3 would not have sounded substantially different and I know from personal experience that Ortofon puts a very high value on customer service. My preference would have been after my spending $1300 Dynavector given me the benefit of the doubt, maybe testing me by proposing to replace the 10x5 with a 20x2- if I was willing to come out of pocket another $350+.
My sense is Dynavector just isn't willing to "eat" the $650 under any circumstances. This is understandable, but my own personal "quirk" is I don't think this is how business ought be done. A warranty needs to mean a warranty, and a customer in this price range deserves 100% satisfaction, as long as it can be established the customer is acting in good faith.
Choose wisely.
After examining my table, arm and Dynavector for 45 minutes, then 30 minutes on the phone with Dynavector's N.A. rep, my very conscientious audio guy told me the consensus is there is nothing wrong with my cartridge.
The conclusion is asserted as reasonable based upon the following:
1. Upon examination the skating, etc., problem did not reoccur;
2. The Dynavector has a "quirk" of riding very low;
3. It is likely the cueing mechanism on the Rega arm might have been "caught" so as to effect the weight/pressure improperly, causing the problem.
No question it sounds fine right now, so I'll try and keep the faith. But I still wish I had opted for an Ortofon. An MC 3 would not have sounded substantially different and I know from personal experience that Ortofon puts a very high value on customer service. My preference would have been after my spending $1300 Dynavector given me the benefit of the doubt, maybe testing me by proposing to replace the 10x5 with a 20x2- if I was willing to come out of pocket another $350+.
My sense is Dynavector just isn't willing to "eat" the $650 under any circumstances. This is understandable, but my own personal "quirk" is I don't think this is how business ought be done. A warranty needs to mean a warranty, and a customer in this price range deserves 100% satisfaction, as long as it can be established the customer is acting in good faith.
Choose wisely.