The N10 is a nice unit, sounds great, marginally better sounding than a Macbook. But be aware that having to use an Ipad to control a device is a mixed blessing. If your internet or network is down, your music will be inaccessible. That is the current state of the art for music servers.
MAC Book Pro Computer vs Aurender N100h vs Aurender N10 Music Servers
I am considering replacing my MAC Book Pro Computer with the Aurender N100h music server. The N100h has received great reviews, has quality construction, provides Tidal support and offers the convenience of using an iPad. My local dealer "highly recommends" I consider the Aurender N10 music server OVER the Aurender N100h server. He feels the N10 would sound much better than my current MAC Book Pro Commuter or the N100h. He said the N100h would only be marginal better than my MAC Book Pro. To be honest, I was really considering the N100h because of its sound quality, construction and my budget.
However, based on the reviews, etc., I am sure the Aurender N10 sounds great but it costs $8,000 (expensive). I found one N100h review that said “ ….Not one single combination of Mac Mini & peripheral devices has so far bested the sound of Aurender’s N100H; a digital audio streamer/server that comes pre-loaded with: 1) audiophile-approved 120Gb solid state hard drive (for cached playback); 2) custom 35 Watt linear power supply; 3) low noise USB output. Check one, check two, check three”.
This is probably not a fair comparison since the N10 cost is $8k and the N100h cost is $3k. What are your comments about replacing my MAC Book Pro Computer with either the N10 or the N100h? Has anyone replaced their MAC Book Pro with one of these Aurender servers?
And, yes, I plan on visiting my local store shortly to hear both the N10 and the N100h. My current MAC Book Pro computer is connected to my Bricasti M1 DAC connected to my Hypex NCore NC400 Bridged mono blocks class D power amplifiers and my Sonus Faber Olympic II Speakers. The 4 NC400 power amplifiers (2 amps per side) were modified (4 R141 chips removed) to match to the volume control in the Bricasti M1 DAC (running DAC direct to amp, no pre-amplifier). Thanks.
However, based on the reviews, etc., I am sure the Aurender N10 sounds great but it costs $8,000 (expensive). I found one N100h review that said “ ….Not one single combination of Mac Mini & peripheral devices has so far bested the sound of Aurender’s N100H; a digital audio streamer/server that comes pre-loaded with: 1) audiophile-approved 120Gb solid state hard drive (for cached playback); 2) custom 35 Watt linear power supply; 3) low noise USB output. Check one, check two, check three”.
This is probably not a fair comparison since the N10 cost is $8k and the N100h cost is $3k. What are your comments about replacing my MAC Book Pro Computer with either the N10 or the N100h? Has anyone replaced their MAC Book Pro with one of these Aurender servers?
And, yes, I plan on visiting my local store shortly to hear both the N10 and the N100h. My current MAC Book Pro computer is connected to my Bricasti M1 DAC connected to my Hypex NCore NC400 Bridged mono blocks class D power amplifiers and my Sonus Faber Olympic II Speakers. The 4 NC400 power amplifiers (2 amps per side) were modified (4 R141 chips removed) to match to the volume control in the Bricasti M1 DAC (running DAC direct to amp, no pre-amplifier). Thanks.
- ...
- 56 posts total
That is an excellent point. Aurender has solved this problem by providing a Wi-Fi dongle as an access point. I saw this in a demo at THE Show. When you have difficulty in connecting or controlling Aurender Music Servers, attaching Wi-Fi dongle to the back of the unit can solve the problem because it enhances communication between your iPad and Aurender music server. Aurender music server needs more robust and faster connection to the Wi-Fi router than surfing the internet. You can use a Wi-Fi dongle to connect your iPad to the Aurender. This method will provide file playback only as there is no connection to the internet. The Wi-Fi dingle allies you to play music from your If you want to use streaming services like TIDAL or Qobuz you need to connect Aurender to the internet using the wired connection. Sent from my iPhone 6s |
More details on the Aurender Wi-Fi dongle are on this link. http://www.aurender.com/page/appguide-wifidongle |
I asked Aurender Customer Support about MQA
availability on the music servers and their response is below: "Aurender music
servers already support MQA files since we are a bit perfect file transport.
Whether or not you will be able to experience MQA at it’s full potential, will
depend on the DAC being used and whether or not it offers MQA decoding. We’ve
already demonstrated MQA files played back from our servers with compatible
DACs on a few occasions. Aurender's new A10 music
server with analog outputs will also support MQA and will offer the full
benefits of MQA decoding and analog conversion. We should be shipping this in
the fall, at least that is the goal. At the moment we are still finalizing
hardware and software for the A10". In addition, I found that Tidal is working on a
Tidal MQA implementation but has not posted any details or dates. I will
email them for an update. Tidal web site states a "firm date for launching
MQA has not been set. We will of course let everyone know if/when MQA becomes
available". http://www.whathifi.com/news/tidal-showcases-mqa-streaming-ces-2016-launch-delayed As noted above, the ability to use MQA depends on the DAC being used and whether or not it offers MQA decoding. I have no information regarding the sound quality from using MQA. |
- 56 posts total