Lowrider & David, thanks for the additional comments. Lowrider, yes, in the rear panel photos of the amp that I’ve looked at via Google Images it says "120VAC 50/60 Hz" immediately under the fuseholder, as you indicated. But further down and a bit to the right, just under where the power cord emerges from the panel, the photos I’ve looked at say something like "for continued fire protection use original fuse type and rating only of MDA-10."
Here is a
datasheet for the MDA series of fuses. Note in its title and in the first line under "description" the words "time delay," which would certainly seem to correspond to slow blow. Also, Digikey’s listing of that fuse, shown
here, states "response time: slow." And the "nominal melting" spec of 1491.3 amps squared-seconds for the MDA-10 is well into the "slow" category, for a 10 amp fuse.
So if that same wording appears on the rear of your amp I would have a good deal of concern that an expensive fuse described as fast blow might not last too long in that amp, regardless of what the manual says.
Regarding Bob Carver, he certainly was (and still is) quite an innovative designer. For a goodly number of years starting around 1982 I used his model M400t amplifier, a 200 watt/channel amp in the form of a cube measuring just a bit more than 7 inches on a side(!). It was designed to emulate the "transfer function" of the very highly regarded Mark Levinson ML-2, a pure class A design rated at 25 watts or so into 8 ohms but capable of providing enormous amounts of current into low impedances. Although Mr. Carver pretty much admitted in a TAS interview a few years ago that as might be expected the design succeeded in emulating the ML-2 just to a loose approximation at best, it provided me with very satisfactory results for quite a few years, until I eventually transitioned to tubes. And it seemed every bit as powerful as its rating would suggest, at least when used in conjunction with the easy to drive speakers I was using at the time.
Prior to that time, though, I very briefly owned a predecessor model, designated as the M400a if I recall correctly, which was not designed to emulate anything and provided sonics that were quite disappointing. But the M400t was a "night and day" improvement on that earlier effort, and he presumably carried the benefits of those experiences forward into his Sunfire years.
Best regards,
-- Al