tatyana69, with all due respect I think you are getting hung up in conceptual quandaries and "missing the (music) forest for the trees". You can’t have it both ways. You are correct, a "composer’s fertile mind" would, in fact, "leap at the opportunities today". However, you seem to be missing some key points:
First, the composers you seem to be referring to DID NOT live today. The tools that you are referring to were not available when they composed. So, the artistic integrity of their works is inextricably linked to what was available to them. Moreover, those very composers would be the first to point out that this reality needs to be respected and that for anyone besides the composer to try and alter how that artistic vision is presented after the fact is to not respect the music and belies a lack of understanding or appreciation of values that are an integral part of quality art; values which emphasize nuance and subtlety ("blob music"?!) and not just the hyper-stimulation that our modern electronically "advanced" culture and it’s music listeners have become accustomed to.
First, the composers you seem to be referring to DID NOT live today. The tools that you are referring to were not available when they composed. So, the artistic integrity of their works is inextricably linked to what was available to them. Moreover, those very composers would be the first to point out that this reality needs to be respected and that for anyone besides the composer to try and alter how that artistic vision is presented after the fact is to not respect the music and belies a lack of understanding or appreciation of values that are an integral part of quality art; values which emphasize nuance and subtlety ("blob music"?!) and not just the hyper-stimulation that our modern electronically "advanced" culture and it’s music listeners have become accustomed to.