Do equipment stands have an impact on electronics?


Mechanical grounding or isolation from vibration has been a hot topic as of late.  Many know from experience that footers, stands and other vibration technologies impact things that vibrate a lot like speakers, subs or even listening rooms (my recent experience with an "Energy room").  The question is does it have merit when it comes to electronics and if so why?  Are there plausible explanations for their effect on electronics or suggested measurement paradigms to document such an effect?
agear

oleschool wrote,

"No trolling here , as much as i try to wrap my mind around some of the principles, like dark matter treatments etc i find myself bewildered."

Dunno no why you’re so bewildered as the explanation of my Dark Matter treatment is relatively straightforward and easy to grasp.

oleschool also wrote,

"Guess i needed more physics in college . I must admit my lego experience was with the blocks 😬
Dam music theory took most of my time along with being a musician for 35 yrs ."

The explanation for Dark Matter is so simple even someone in elementary school should be able to follow it. I thought musicians were mathematical geniuses.

oleschool also wrote,

"Riddle me this oz
when i have seen pics of some of your early platforms there was some serious gear on them .
have you decided that you have superceeded that type of gear and your early platform with a walkman and markers ? That is truly a serious question, because thats alot cheaper . I just feel unworthy 😔"

Why would you assume my customers have Walkmans (Walkmen?). When you ASSUME something you make an ass out of me and Uma Thurman. In any case I'm as serious as a heart attack.

Finally, oleschool wrote,

"Also in my limited 30yrs in the audiophile world my personal experience has shown good and bad when it comes to racks , i have found a proper designed platform or rack does improve sound . My two cent on the actual thread 🙏"

Sorry, but once I see, "I have 30 years in audio or I have been doing this for 40 years, therefore..." I don’t read whatever comes next. Force of habit. Lol

Have a nice day

agear OP
1,174 posts
10-22-2016 10:49pm
Geoffkait:I'm pretty sure we've heard from all the trolls, now. Have I missed anyone?

Don't forget yourself cupcake. You have had that label tossed at you on many a thread.

So, for the uninitiated, what is an "information field"?

I suggest we stay on topic and not get too far afield. Get it? Afield? 

Cheers
 



Agear asked,

"For the uninitiated what’s an information field?"

i use information field and Morphic field interchangeably. Here is a summary from somewhere in cyberspace that I think represents a fairly good and consider overview. I have also discussed Morphic fields at some length in my explanations for the Clever Little Clock and the Teleportation Tweak.

Morphic Fields: A Summary

The hypothesized properties of morphic fields at all levels of complexity can be summarized as follows:

1. ​They are self-organizing wholes.

2. ​They have both a spatial and a temporal aspect, and organize spatio-temporal patterns of vibratory or rhythmic activity.

3. ​They attract the systems under their influence towards characteristic forms and patterns of activity, whose coming-into-being they organize and whose integrity they maintain. The ends or goals towards which morphic fields attract the systems under their influence are called attractors. The pathways by which systems usually reach these attractors are called chreodes.

4. ​They interrelate and co-ordinate the morphic units or holons that lie within them, which in turn are wholes organized by morphic fields. Morphic fields contain other morphic fields within them in a nested hierarchy or holarchy.

5. ​They are structures of probability, and their organizing activity is probabilistic.

6. They contain a built-in memory given by self-resonance with a morphic unit’s own past and by morphic resonance with all previous similar systems. This memory is cumulative. The more often particular patterns of activity are repeated, the more habitual they tend to become.

geoff kait
machina dynamica
no goats no glory
All I can say having read all this is may I please have the 10 minutes of my life I just spent reading this back?
Common, we know you like it and couldn't stay away.  You have had some of the best beat downs on quantum fairies....;)
i use information field and Morphic field interchangeably. Here is a summary from somewhere in cyberspace that I think represents a fairly good and consider overview. I have also discussed Morphic fields at some length in my explanations for the Clever Little Clock and the Teleportation Tweak.

Morphic Fields: A Summary

The hypothesized properties of morphic fields at all levels of complexity can be summarized as follows:

1. ​They are self-organizing wholes.

2. ​They have both a spatial and a temporal aspect, and organize spatio-temporal patterns of vibratory or rhythmic activity.

3. ​They attract the systems under their influence towards characteristic forms and patterns of activity, whose coming-into-being they organize and whose integrity they maintain. The ends or goals towards which morphic fields attract the systems under their influence are called attractors. The pathways by which systems usually reach these attractors are called chreodes.

4. ​They interrelate and co-ordinate the morphic units or holons that lie within them, which in turn are wholes organized by morphic fields. Morphic fields contain other morphic fields within them in a nested hierarchy or holarchy.

5. ​They are structures of probability, and their organizing activity is probabilistic.

6. They contain a built-in memory given by self-resonance with a morphic unit’s own past and by morphic resonance with all previous similar systems. This memory is cumulative. The more often particular patterns of activity are repeated, the more habitual they tend to become.



Sounds like a description of living matter. Can you provide a specific example from nature?