Do equipment stands have an impact on electronics?

Agear wrote,

"My Pop was a Biochemistry professor with a PhD from Oxford. I am sure he is familiar with Sheldrake and his woo woo babblings. He has generated no data, no NIH grants or body of research to support this. He is an apologist for pantheistic woo woo plain and simple. "

I hate to judge before all the facts are in but I’d say you inherited your Pop's close-minded brain. Guess Morphic resonance does work! LOL 

Agear also wrote,

"Geoff, did these things come to you in an epiphany or did you do the subconscious copy and paste from chaps like Sheldrake?"

Would you believe I copied the paragraphs from Sheldrake’s website. I never said the words were mine. In fact I said they were not mine. Hel-loo!

randy-11
103 posts
10-23-2016 8:16pm
oleschool - Spock wasn’t trained in abnormal psychology

gkaitt is trying to insert a notion invented by the notorious fakir, Rupert Sheldrake

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_Sheldrake

it was pseudo-scientific gibberish then, and has not improved with age.

::::::::::::

Randy is kinda like Eggo waffles. Thick and flakey. Geez, just try to elevate the level of discussion.

Would you believe I copied the paragraphs from Sheldrake’s website. I never said the words were mine. In fact I said they were not mine. Hel-loo!

And you ascribe to this woo woo without data?  Hel-loo!????

Its just theory, but should not be presented so brusquely as fact.  That is your primary weakness in the context of these debates.    

agear OP
1,180 posts
10-24-2016 1:15pm
Would you believe I copied the paragraphs from Sheldrake’s website. I never said the words were mine. In fact I said they were not mine. Hel-loo!
And you ascribe to this woo woo without data? Hel-loo!????

Its just theory, but should not be presented so brusquely as fact. That is your primary weakness in the context of these debates.

Hmmmm. It’s the concept, silly. Data is for sissies. Your weakness in this particular debate is that you are not prepared to defend *either* position. Yet you want to argue and be snippy. In short, a troll. Anyone can see your OP was nothing more than a lame troll. A troll by a wannabe. Have you considered going back to school? Maybe follow in your Daddy’s footsteps.

agear - It is not even theory, in the scientific definition of theory.

It is just woo-woo, and utterly worthless.

It IS fun to watch him try to duck and jive now though.