Do equipment stands have an impact on electronics?


Mechanical grounding or isolation from vibration has been a hot topic as of late.  Many know from experience that footers, stands and other vibration technologies impact things that vibrate a lot like speakers, subs or even listening rooms (my recent experience with an "Energy room").  The question is does it have merit when it comes to electronics and if so why?  Are there plausible explanations for their effect on electronics or suggested measurement paradigms to document such an effect?
agear
why, YES, you did check in

I hate to tell you but I have a pretty sound technical education, and provide the same for others up to the PhD level and beyond.

I have also installed a few car stereos for myself only, so you may have some sort of edge there.

You have a penchant for embarrassing yourself in public.  While sad, feel free to keep it up.
randy-11
107 posts
10-24-2016 4:40pm
"why, YES, you did check in

I hate to tell you but I have a pretty sound technical education, and provide the same for others up to the PhD level and beyond.

I have also installed a few car stereos for myself only, so you may have some sort of edge there.

You have a penchant for embarrassing yourself in public. While sad, feel free to keep it up."

I see no evidence of any education, little fella. You don’t even have an argument. I’m sure you’re lying. I’d guess you have a GED, tops, based on the level of intelligence YOU exhibit in YOUR posts.

agear OP
1,181 posts
10-24-2016 4:03pm
Randy: "agear - It is not even theory, in the scientific definition of theory.

It is just woo-woo, and utterly worthless."

To which agear replied,

"It IS fun to watch him try to duck and jive now though.
Agreed. The jokes and ad hominem are less impactful when your underwear is around your ankles....."

Look at it this way. At least someone in your family got an education. You’re left with a high school sense of humor. Your daddy must be very proud.
Geoff, your theories, while entertaining, are not helping the thread at this point.  Try starting another thread along those lines if you wish.  
Agear, they are not even theories, they are hypotheses. In other words, a guess. The reason you never see any supporting evidence or documentation for his products is because there is none. No scientist has bought any of them and said "Wow, this is going to change the world!" or "This thing really works." I am not talking six moons or any end users. I mean real scientists that can peer review something like this. That would be how real scientific discoveries are validated. Geoff would never allow that to happen because the fraud would be exposed.