Do equipment stands have an impact on electronics?


Mechanical grounding or isolation from vibration has been a hot topic as of late.  Many know from experience that footers, stands and other vibration technologies impact things that vibrate a lot like speakers, subs or even listening rooms (my recent experience with an "Energy room").  The question is does it have merit when it comes to electronics and if so why?  Are there plausible explanations for their effect on electronics or suggested measurement paradigms to document such an effect?
agear

Mr. Kait states: - The only way you can possibly deal wih seismic waves is to decouple the component from them, and I'm referring to rotational (bending) forces in additional to the usual vertical forces and forces in the horizontal plane.  

Your springs are actually functioning as a “direct coupling mechanism”. Depending on the actual materials and dimensions of springs used, the speed of the resonance transfer will vary as will the bandwidth of frequencies across the audible and inaudible spectrum, yielding different sonic results in comparison. Frequency and Speed with springs is complexly related to the mass and mass distribution of the component. We too have used springs in our studies and development processes and have found that there are too many variables in each possible usage scenario; there is no “one-size fits all” with spring coupling. Ultimately, you are ‘NOT Decoupling’ with the use of metallic springs - try another material.

You have yet to respond, answer or clarify or prove to us; how inaudible seismic waves affect the performance of a stereo system in either a standard or more efficient listening environment, nor have you provided any indication as to how such waves have such a dramatic effect on the "audible performance" and/or musical quality of playback equipment when mechanically grounded.

Do inaudible seismic waves affect the performance of musical instruments in some “audible” way that the world is not aware of?

Mr. Kait stated: Sorry, but once I see, "I have 30 years in audio or I have been doing this for 40 years, therefore..." I don’t read whatever comes next. Force of habit. Lol

Then why not leave the “majority” of audio veterans alone and exploit your visions elsewhere? Like Coulomb Friction, you clog up all signal pathways and “therefore”, in my opinion you should mechanically transfer out!

Robert

Star Sound



he won't respond coherently, answer or clarify or prove because he can't

he WILL likely make some comment like the above ones, indicating a middle school student is posting 
Robert wrote,

"Geoff, your springs are acting as a direct coupling mechanism."

Robert, when I read that sentence milk squirted out of my nose. Seriously. I will post a more complete response in due course. (Are you sure you’re not Michael Green’s evil twin?)

cheers,

geoff kait
machina dramatica
give me a stiff enough spring and I’ll isolate the world

If you recall you were the one who demanded I discuss Morphic resonance. In fact you insinuated I was dodging your questions. You can’t have it both ways, silly. OK, you can proceed with your troll thread.
Yes, and the information received is not helpful due to its very nature.  Next.
What is the difference between a hypothesis and a theory? | CARM https://carm.org/difference-hypothesis-theory
A hypothesis is an attempt to explain phenomena. ... A theory is the result of testing a hypothesisand developing an explanation that is assumed to be true about something. A theory replaces thehypothesis after testing confirms the hypothesis, or the hypothesis is modified and tested ...


No they are not the same thing. A readily accepted and thoroughly tested hypothesis becomes a theory. Of course you had to try to deflect to something else to avoid the point of the post. Pretty typical. Google sure is a great thing. Pretty much every reply to the query said the same thing, but you knew that, didn't you? When will any of your products ever get to the point of being a theory instead of a guess?