Do equipment stands have an impact on electronics?

You apprently have no idea what you’re talking about. Sheldrake is a PhD from Cambridge who has written a slew of books including the landmark The Presence of the Past. Intellectual is as intellectual does. It’s all in the concept, Ollie. You have to start somewhere. That’s where the genius is. The math can be done later by the drudges. A journey starts with a single step, grasshopper.

"Presence of the Past"?  LOL.  How about "Absence of Evidence."  Being an apologist or apostle of woo woo does not make you an expert, just another guessing fool.  I assume you consider Deepak Chopra a genius too by your metric?

Along with rudimentary English composition, was there an introduction to logic class offered during your freshman year at E school?  Not show up much to class?

I did do a research project in grad school that won an award. It was on effects of earthquakes in the New Madrid Missouri area where the largest earthquakes in US history occurred. Even there I would not worry about it affecting my sound. It’s a silly topic really.

Just my 2 cents. I know gk cares. 😉

Agreed.  Its a red herring.  Completely meaningless.  

agear OP
1,201 posts
10-29-2016 9:49am
Geoffkait:You apprently have no idea what you’re talking about. Sheldrake is a PhD from Cambridge who has written a slew of books including the landmark The Presence of the Past. Intellectual is as intellectual does. It’s all in the concept, Ollie. You have to start somewhere. That’s where the genius is. The math can be done later by the drudges. A journey starts with a single step, grasshopper.

""Presence of the Past"? LOL. How about "Absence of Evidence." Being an apologist or apostle of woo woo does not make you an expert, just another guessing fool. I assume you consider Deepak Chopra a genius too by your metric?

Along with rudimentary English composition, was there an introduction to logic class offered during your freshman year at E school? Not show up much to class?"

Actually The Presence of the Past is filled with logically laid out evidence of Morphic resonance. Saying there is no evidence is actually a typical undergraduate mistake in logic, you know, since you have not even looked at the evidence. Btw I have more semester hours than you do and more difficult course material. So you can drop the pretense that you’re some some of Master debater. I did not fall off the turnip truck yesterday. The problem with your logic is you use a PhD, your Pop, to refute Morphic resonance. But that doesn’t make sense, it’s an appeal to authority. Just because your Pop is a PhD in the SAME FIELD doesn't mean Morphic resonance is NOT REAL. That's a, you know, fallacious argument. Same with using your biology background an Dumpty ump years in school. Strictly a fallacious argument. Follow?

have a nice weekend

Sheldrake is a debunked non-scientist.  Don't confuse science with 'intellectualism" -- it shows you do not understand science at all.

The same applies to the spurious notion that morphic woo-woo has to be proven wrong.  One always has to show experimental evidence for something before it will get any acceptance in science.