Do equipment stands have an impact on electronics?


Mechanical grounding or isolation from vibration has been a hot topic as of late.  Many know from experience that footers, stands and other vibration technologies impact things that vibrate a lot like speakers, subs or even listening rooms (my recent experience with an "Energy room").  The question is does it have merit when it comes to electronics and if so why?  Are there plausible explanations for their effect on electronics or suggested measurement paradigms to document such an effect?
agear

mapman
13,836 posts
10-29-2016 4:20pm
Keep rambling Kimosabe. Maybe there is someout there who cares about your meaningless blather and useless products.

So sayeth the geologist. Now I see why you keep trying to pass yourself off as an engineer. I wouldn’t want to call myself a geologist, either. By the way, that was almost a compete sentence you wrote, Commander. Can I suggest you anesthetize yourself with liquor if it will make you feel better? I understand how angry and wrapped around the axel you get. :-)

There is no joy today in Mudville.

Post removed 
I think his idea is to keep talking as fast as possible so people will forget the idiocy of a few minutes ago.

PT Barnum style...
Actually The Presence of the Past is filled with logically laid out evidence of Morphic resonance.
Such as?  Speculative Biology is fun reading much like the Tao of Physics and other quantum pablum.  Much of it has the same intellectual merit as science fiction.  There is some merit in it but not enough to build a company around.  
 
Saying there is no evidence is actually a typical undergraduate mistake in logic, you know, since you have not even looked at the evidence.

Again, quote something specific for us as examples.  For a formal deconstruction of Sheldrake's "crimes against reasons can be found here:  https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2009/feb/05/evolution

Btw I have more semester hours than you do and more difficult course material.
No you don't.  I have 19 yrs of formal education and training.  You have 4.  
 
So you can drop the pretense that you’re some some of Master debater.
No pretense needed.

I did not fall off the turnip truck yesterday.
Based on the construction of both your arguments and garbled mentation, one has to wonder.
 
The problem with your logic is you use a PhD, your Pop, to refute Morphic resonance.
no, it refutes itself.
But that doesn’t make sense, it’s an appeal to authority.
Ironically, that is what Deepak Chopra (and by sins of association) Sheldrake pull:  http://www.patheos.com/blogs/danthropology/2015/07/professor-jerry-coyne-explains-why-deepak-chopra-is-nothing-more-than-a-fraud/
 
Just because your Pop is a PhD in the SAME FIELD doesn't mean Morphic resonance is NOT REAL. That's a, you know, fallacious argument.
That wasn't the argument Einstein.  Hel-looo?    
 
Same with using your biology background an Dumpty ump years in school. Strictly a fallacious argument. Follow?

No, I don't follow.

I think we need an addendum aphorism to Einstein's quip about education being what's left.  How about this:  

Knowledge is what remains after time has robbed the mind of facts. The mind then attempts to fill in the blanks through a process called confabulation which to the impassive observer appears like magical thinking.  Enter the neoshamans Sheldrake and Chopra.....  
maybe it wasn't a turnip truck at all, but a truck hauling organic fertilizer