^^^
folkfreak ...
Thanks for the quick response.
That's exactly what I wanted to hear. I suspected that the power tubes would be a significant improvement ... but twice as good? ... Great, I'll save them for last. I suppose the increased glass/size of the power tubes is what makes the difference over the signal tubes.
Just changing the dampeners on the signal tubes in my REF-3 has made a world of difference. I can only imagine what your REF-40 and your Phono 2SE sounds like. It has to be wonderful.
I just love my ARC gear. I have an ARC Classic 60 that is used as a spare. It used to be my main amp. It doesn't have a removable power cord, no mods at all even. I had it completely gone through by the local tech this year. I used it when I was between the REF-75 and the REF-75se. Gotta say ... its warmer sounding and not as accurate as the latest REF gear, but man 'o man ... it just melts your heart.
Looking forward to more of your reports on the tube dampeners.
Take care ...
OP
folkfreak ...
Thanks for the quick response.
That's exactly what I wanted to hear. I suspected that the power tubes would be a significant improvement ... but twice as good? ... Great, I'll save them for last. I suppose the increased glass/size of the power tubes is what makes the difference over the signal tubes.
Just changing the dampeners on the signal tubes in my REF-3 has made a world of difference. I can only imagine what your REF-40 and your Phono 2SE sounds like. It has to be wonderful.
I just love my ARC gear. I have an ARC Classic 60 that is used as a spare. It used to be my main amp. It doesn't have a removable power cord, no mods at all even. I had it completely gone through by the local tech this year. I used it when I was between the REF-75 and the REF-75se. Gotta say ... its warmer sounding and not as accurate as the latest REF gear, but man 'o man ... it just melts your heart.
Looking forward to more of your reports on the tube dampeners.
Take care ...
OP