Do equipment stands have an impact on electronics?

I am not a troll,I am a
musician and audiophile among many things . There obviously are solutions at various levels or designs to vibration . At 2-3 k per stand under spkr, amp ,pre,tt and digital that is quite expensive to the average joe . I believe this is system related , i have been reading and occasionally commenting since the first comment . I get discouraged by the chastising and belittling of members because they are not smart enough ..there will be different viewpoints , i see this all the time with instruments , there is science yes but there is also sound .. I am well aware of your one unit system gk , not everyone wants a headphone only or a modded walkman . Even if it is the cats meow , which has been debated over and over .. I would be shocked if over half of this thread didn’t say  the exact same thing 50 times. Opinions aren’t changing , I said i like Roberts audiopoint they work for me at a somewhat reasonable price considering what they do for my sound.I hated sorbethene it was a no go for my setup .
As for your tweeks gk how can anyone even try them when you blacklist any member here to try your "springs" ?
Just because a c.a.d machine carves a guitar body does not make it sound better then a handmade martin to me . I respond to final sound, at the price I determine to be acceptable for my situation.
Cheers

What you see is what you get..https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5hBXr3aJus

Observational facts: New York City - a real test and listening  environment for seismic activity.

“Earth crust motion, other earth vibration, wind, footfall, traffic, subway, ocean wave action, local construction, large fans and speaker feedback”

Speaker feedback? (Only if you are a poor sound engineer :)

Add to that El trains (but not so much in Manhattan), subterranean city and workers 24-7, rivers, shipping and large engines, cab drivers complaining, aircraft, crowds of humanity singing and dancing, plates, glasses and bottles clattering, live band instruments (acoustic and electronic) and percussion and any other type of noise you can imagine…

And the liquid in the glass remains stable, not only stable but there are no discernable opposite reactions of the waves hitting the glass; would not they come back then forth again creating even greater instability of the fluid surface?  Still extremely calm with a powerhouse subwoofer system beneath and a 1500 watt satellite system direct coupled to the subwoofer cabinet then add to that another pair of identical cabinets located on stage left and a half dozen floor monitors too!

Now that is what I call a full frequency range testing environment.

Clearly more energy heading to ground (flooring) versus coming up the chain.

Tom. Star Sound.   

Oleic hooligans,

Good for you! You’re not a troll. Before you get your knickers in a bunch, however, you must have been snoozing when I relented and agreed to let you purchase something. But that was some time ago and my offer has since expired. Here we are back at square 1.

In case you hadn’t noticed this thread is actually about the technical end of things, not the sound. Nothing wrong with arguing about sound but it’s subjective. What sounds low in distortion to you most likely sounds rather distorted to me. Not only that but audiophiles have been known to puff up their listening impressions on occasion. I know, say it isn’t so!!

I also have a Star Sound rack. Also several of their cones. Very rigid and heavy! All of them sound different. The MIG supports work very well. 

All isolation devices, not Star Sound products