Hi viridian,
You are more than welcome to visit anytime you are in the Houston area. Seriously.
Never heard 1.5s, but I would imagine that the design was the best that could be done with the size and cost targets. I would never describe the sound of my 5i’s or the 2 2s I just sold to be slow. Not even close. These models were praised by almost everyone as having exceptional transient response and superior macro/micro dynamic performance
I am more of a fan of the Thiel 2 2, 3.5, 3.6, 5i era. Jim Thiel went to extremes to make the 1st-order crossovers work with these models IMO.
Indeed the 1st-order crossover is tough on drivers as the crossover allows them to see frequencies significantly outside of their stock design parameters. That’s why Jim took great care in driver selection and almost always used drivers modified to his specifications. Even the tweeters in the 2 2, 3.6, and 5i are custom made to Jim’s specs by Vifa to provide extraordinary excursion.
Jim published a white paper explaining it all very thoroughly. I can’t find a link to it on the web but I do have a hard copy. He used both a slanted & rounded baffle (the ones in my 5i’s are made of a heavy, inert marble/composite material) and carefully-engineered electrical circuits in the crossover to delay the signal exactly the right amount to ensure time and phase alignment between the drivers AT A SPECIFIED DISTANCE! of around 8 feet from baffle to listener. Thus, they do not work well in near-field environments. My 5i’s are 8 feet out from the wall to the front of the baffle, 8 feet apart from tweeter to tweeter, and 8 feet from my listening position, which is 8 feet from the wall behind me.
orpheus10, I can’t understand how the crossovers in your speakers could be modeled after the 1st-order Thiel crossover if they are 4th-order as you say?
Best to you both,
Dave