Rigid
- unable to bend or be forced out of shape; not flexible.
- not able to be changed or adapted.

Yes- that is how I was using that. In addition, I expect the plinth to otherwise be as dead as possible.

Its important to understand that no plinth will be 100% rigid and dead but you do the best you can.

@Atmasphere - fwiw I enjoy reading your posts on amplifiers / preamps, but do find your posts on analog playback don’t follow my experiences sometimes. Like here. Could this be because you sell Empire turntables and have a business relationship with Triplanar ? Well thats cool;
but all you have to do in your own room is start the 15 IPS tape and then 10 seconds later start the record. Toggle between the two adjusting for the fact one is high level and one is low level. The turntable set up is very tweakable so one can learn its limits quickly this way and adjust.  Have you compared this way in your own personal room ?
Because of the eminently tweakable nature of turntables, I never set up a room with vinyl first. Digital and Tape 15 IPS has excellent, consistent bass. Once that is setup I bring in the vinyl artillery. Its that easy.


I use master tapes as a reference, and have LPs and CDs made from the master tapes. Having been there when the recording was made is an enormous help in establishing a reference! (Atma-Sphere LP 3-001 also issued on CD being one I refer to a lot)

I do sell the model 208 turntable which is heavily based on the Empire, however the ability to market this machine is really limited due to the fact that its entirely dependent on our ability to find the original machines. The 208 is also not a big seller; I base my comments more on how any LP mastering lathe is designed where its very obvious in spades that this rigid coupling concept I espouse is well-known and striven-for by the lathe producers.

Now you might argue that what applies to the lathe does not apply to playback but its pretty easy to see why that idea would be mistaken. In a nutshell, ideally you reverse the process during playback. The addition of an extra plane or planes of vibration during playback on its face sounds like its not a good idea and this is borne out in practice. At every point when we improved the plinth in the turntable by making it more rigid and more dead the closer it got to sounding like the master tape.

Regarding Triplanar: my 'business relationship' with them is limited to shows. I own several of their arms because they have proven over the years to do the best job of playing the LPs I mentioned earlier. To that end specifically: tracking is effortless, the bass is obviously better (in the recording the biggest bass drum in the state of Minnesota was employed on my insistence; it was 6' in diameter and is played both loudly and very quietly; many systems fail to bring it out properly); the mids and highs have the best definition and sound the closest to the tape of any arm I've heard.

"As Davorin Furlan noted during the project presentation, the product combines a commercial factor and a desire to meet current design trends. “We came to a conclusion that during our talks about new ideas, we often change platters thinking for a long time, which one should be played the next. At first, our idea on that a vinyl record has to fly in the air seemed strange. However, the things changed after we bought a magnetic levitator

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MV9Pi-K56ks

and found out that it was possible indeed,” the product developers told. After several months of tests, they were able to create a working prototype of a classic turntable."


One can’t help wondering why the inventors of the mag lev turntable didn’t also employ mag lev for the tonearm, which appears to be an easier task than mag leving the platter. Then the new mag lev turntable would be analogous to the air bearing everything Maplenoll (that I used to own), the special edition one with the 50 lb platter. I’m also not sure why all the hoopla since vinyl records have been "flying in the air" for more than 30 years, you know, with Maplenoll, Verdier and Walker turntables. Looks like a clear case of stove piping.

cheers

One can’t help wondering why the inventors of the mag lev turntable didn’t also employ mag lev for the tonearm, which appears to be an easier task than mag leving the platter. Then the new mag lev turntable would be analogous to the air bearing everything


GK - Are you able to tell us how the platter works, (I have an idea), and how doing the arm equivalent would be easier ?
 
They could always add an air bearing tonearm later - phase two. And hey - I can recommend one !     :^)

I’m also not sure why all the hoopla since vinyl records have been "flying in the air" for more than 30 years, you know, with Maplenoll, Verdier and Walker turntables. Looks like a clear case of stove piping.


This turntable brings the isolation benefits of levitating for $1000. also have a look - there is no spindle below the platter. 

8^0

I'm still not getting how a spended platter and direct coupled tonearm to the plinth is suppose to be a good thing.

Major issues with that, I would think.