Cary cinema 11a or Krell HTS 7.1 ???

Although I really love Cary Tube gear I even own some. I think Krell has the better experience in SS HT type stuff however. I am not sure if there is a significant price differential with the Cary representing a large saving over the Krell. If so that may weigh heavily but most important experience larger sales or what not it always comes down to the sound . The best favor you can do for yourself in this question is to go and audition them. I have heard the Krell which is very good, but in all honesty, I am not a home theater type listener.

I replaced a Proceed PAV/PDSD with a Cinema 11a, based on Michael Fremer's glowing review of its sonics, and his conclusion that a separate pre-amp would be superfluous. From reviews, I gathered that the sonics of the Cary were superior to those of the Krell. The Cinema 11a and 12 are buggy, but the sonics are indeed superb, and the bugs mostly haven't bothered me. The one bug that does, the 11a and 12 treat LPCM as DSD and thus provide no bass management, is not an issue if you are using analog out from the BDP-95, because the Oppo passes bass management to the Cary.

db

DB - If the Oppo passes bass management to the Cary, then is the Cary converting the analog to digital first, and then back to analog? If so, wouldn't it be better to go digital out from the Oppo?

Mateored,

My post wasn't clear. The Oppo can pass 7.1 analog to the Cary. If the Cary is set to bypass, the 7.1 is output from the Cary without further processing other than RCA being converted to XLR. What I should have written was that the Oppo does the bass management and can process lossless codecs.

In retrospect, I needn't have replaced the PAV/PDSD, because the PDSD has 5.1 analog pass-through and the Oppo can output lossless codecs. The PDSD also converts RCA to XLR.

db