I should have never ....


... visited the local high end audio store a couple of days ago.

So a couple of days ago, I decided to go down to the local high end audio store to listen to the Proac Response D2 speakers on tube equipment. The folks at this store are very friendly and were willing to go out of their way to accommodate my request. They hooked up the Proacs to some VTL tube separates (sorry I can't remember the exact model numbers, but I believe the VTL preamp and amp were around $9000 combined), and let me listen to the music of my choice - Diana Krall/Live in Paris, Melody Gardot/Currency of Man, Alan Pasqua/The Antisocial Club, etc.

I had high hopes for the Proacs, and for the most part they did not disappoint. The bass was really satisfying, and the details were there for sure. But for some reason I felt that they were more forward sounding than what I had imagined based on reviews. Diana Krall was not sitting in between the other musicians, but she was a good 3 to 4 feet in front of them. I could always tell that the speakers were there, i.e. no wall or disappearing act. I could feel some harshness in the music.

On a whim, I asked them if I could listen to the Sonus Faber Olympica 1 stand mounts that the shop also carries. First of all, I've never seen a more beautiful piece of furniture. They have to be the most gorgeous speakers I've ever seen in my life. The salesman cautioned me that they were almost twice the price of the Proacs. At this point, I'm thinking that the money is probably going more toward aesthetics than sound. I wasn't really expecting a huge difference between the Proacs and the SF Olympicas. But, boy was I wrong!

Unlike many of you, I have only limited experience with high end gear, and almost zero experience with tube equipment. But what I heard that day was a revelation. The Olympicas had the most amazing details, imaging and sound stage. The midrange was pure liquid. And most importantly, they completely disappeared behind the wall of music. Diana Krall was sitting right between the other musicians, a little to the right of the guitarist though. The base was so good that I don't think one would ever need an additional sub. It was that satisfying.

I realize that a lot of that has to do with high end/pricey tube sound and the demo room acoustic setup. But I have not been able to get those few moments out of my head. I was planning on setting up a smaller rig in my study (which is around 10x15 feet), and now I think SF Olympica 1 would be a great choice. The only problem is that it's waaaay over my budget. I was thinking around $3500 total (speakers + integrated + cables), but the Olympicas are over $7500 if you include the gorgeous stands. Of course, I can save money by going the used route but it'll still be way over my original budget.

So my question to all of you -- is there anything else that might compete favorably with the Olympicas in terms of sound (most important) and looks (not the top priority but still a consideration). Whatever I get cannot be big and boxy (Harbeth) though.

Secondly, is there any reasonably priced tube integrated amps that would still provide enough oomph while not sacrificing the stuff that makes tubes so musical and engaging?
128x128arafiq
I have a particular aversion to forward-sounding speakers, and have owned ProAcs for years.  I would never have used that adjective for them.  For much of the time drove Response 2.5s with Cary SE/PureA/Triode.
" I have a particular aversion to forward-sounding speakers, and have owned ProAcs for years. I would never have used that adjective for them. For much of the time drove Response 2.5s with Cary SE/PureA/Triode."

They can be forward sounding, but it depends on the gear. I had the 2.5's myself. Sometimes people think of forward sounding as bright/harsh. With ProAc, that's not the case. The presentation is more immediate and upfront. Its like sitting closer to the music. If you don't like that quality, it can be dealt with using system matching. When I had my 2.5's driven by some amps (ARC VT-100, VAC 30/30, Ayre V-5, Pass Aleph O's, Krell KAS-250), they sound forward. If I put them with more laid back amps (Rowland 112, CJ Premiere 11, ML 331), they sounded much more neutral. 
I have a particular aversion to forward-sounding speakers, and have owned ProAcs for years. I would never have used that adjective for them.


Yeah well we all have different hearing don't we...
I agree the sonus faber olympica all three models are so far my favorite speakers. I think and end speaker for me. It is a well refined speaker and and you may like other well refined speakers that have been recommended like thiel's and like priced vienna acoustics .  you should go listen to a few that are set up well and broken in well. then you can make an informed decision on what you want to pursue and if needed  get a less expensive model in that same line. however I have some vienna acoustics mozart grands and how I have them set up they are in the vien of those olympica's . To me about 80%there. I love my vienna acoustics .