Class D Technology


So I get the obvious strengths of Class D. Efficiency, power output & running cool which allows for small form factors. I also understand the weaknesses somewhat. 1. Non-linear & lots of distortion that needs to be cleaned up with an output filter. 
So my question is, if it weren't for efficiency & power, would there be any reason to own a Class D amp? Do they beat Class A in any other categories that count for sound quality?  
seanheis1
That is trolling
Only in your mind, because you refuse to accept that the higher switching frequency has yet to be realized, and you can't hear anything wrong with it where it is at the present.
Even though companies like Technics are showing the way and striving for higher frequencies, with their very expensive SE-R1.

And as far as not giving any positive post go, I said they have a bass control that can't be equaled, and I'll be the first to get the newer generation of higher switching frequency ones, when they evolve which will fix the problems that many hear in the upper mid and highs, and you obviousely can't.

Cheers George  
mitch2,

     Thank you for your reply, I agree with all you stated and now have a better understanding of your thoughts, situation and position.  

     I'm glad we were able to clarify and think it's a good sign that we were both able to find amplification that we're pleased with utilizing different amp types.

Later,
 Tim

Hi George, I am amongst those who cannot hear any displeasing high freequency artifacts or limitations in some -- and by no means not all -- class D amps in current production. I would include at least:


Rowland M925  and 825 (both based on NC1200), Continuum S2 (Pascal M2-Pro).

Bel Canto Black (NC1200 derivative).

Merrill Veritas (NC1200).


Conversely, a number of older amps, like the old Rowland M501 and 201, and the NuForce did  display modrate to severe audible limitations.


It is also worth mentioning that even the best class D amps can sound limited, oscillating  between screetchy and tubby until break-in is complete, which unfortunately can range between 600 and 2000 hours, depending on power conversion module and amplifier design... THus, breaking in a class D amp can be an exercise in extreme patience and anxiety control *Rolls eyes!* 

   

Yet, As you are mentioning the switching frequency as a probable cause of limitations that you perceive, would is your estimate of the switching frequency one would require to push any such artifacts into the inaudible stratosphere for good?


Saluti, Guido


Nicely said Guido. My Lyngdorf 2170 can also be put into the category of Class D amps that sound as good or better than the many tube and SS amps I have owned in the past. I do not hear any weakness in my integrated amp.   It actually replaced separates costing over $20,000 and sounds even better:) 

In learning about Class D, it appears that after the linear signal is destroyed and turned into a saw tooth wave form, the output filter? tries to put the signal back together...doing an incredible job considering the complexity of this task...but ultimately is unable to restore micro details to recreate the original signal...which people such as myself notice very quickly, while others either don’t notice or enjoy the new coloration.

The opening statement here is false. Here's how class D works:

There are essentially 3 building blocks:
1) the triangle wave generator (sets the 'scan' frequency)
2) A comparitor, the compares the incoming audio signal to the triangle wave
3) the output section. This is the power transistors that switch on and off, and any circuitry needed to drive them

The sawtooth or triangle wave generator is running all the time. The comparitor is too- taking the audio signal and turning either on or off depending on the state of the triangle wave and the audio signal at any given time- the output is a series of pulses of varying width, which are used to switch the output transistors either on or off. This technique is called 'Sigma Delta' and is a means creating the output pulses of varying width so is also known as 'pulse width modulation'

The scan frequency is a function of the triangle wave generator. Some ICs can't make a good triangle wave at higher frequencies so quite often this can be the reason the scan frequency is limited. The other reason might be the output transistor's ability to switch (these days its pretty easy to find inexpensive parts that can switch at well over 1 or 2 MHz...).

There is usually a filter at the output of the amp to filter out the scan frequency. Once that is filtered out, all that is left is a much higher current version of the input signal.

The scan must be kept constant to maintain fidelity. The output devices can sometimes stay on longer than they are supposed to (typically they take longer to turn off than to turn on) so they can both be conducting at the same time. If this happens, you get a phenomenal called 'shoot-through current'  which can heat up the outputs really fast, so sometimes additional circuitry is used to make one transistor wait until the other is off before it turns on. This wait time is called 'dead time'. The longer the dead time the higher the distortion. Dead time is usually needed at higher switching frequencies, so you can see that the need to go to higher frequencies to reduce distortion (and increase resolution) is hampered by the fact that more dead time might be required, which increases distortion. So you can see that the designer has to weigh options!

This is it in a nutshell. Some things are glossed over and others omitted entirely, but if you know what is written here then you have a pretty good idea of how they work.