That's great news @j_damon. Which turntable and tonearm do you use ?
@avanti1960 please consider ARC phonostages too for the ART-9. I totally forgot about it.
@avanti1960 please consider ARC phonostages too for the ART-9. I totally forgot about it.
Pani ... New ART-9 up and running ...
The Cartridge arrived and I took it down to Studio City to Acoustic Image to have Eliot Midwood set it up properly. Eliot is the bomb when it comes to setting up the Well Tempered turn tables correctly.
http://www.acousticimage.com/
So, last night I had Mr. Golden Ears over to get his assessment as well. For a brand new cartridge that had zero hours on it ... all I can say is WOW! This is one naturally musical cartridge that doesn't break the bank. Its everything I liked about the OC9-mk III, but it goes far beyond the OC-9 in every respect.
In a previous post, I talked about the many mono records I own and how good the OC-9 was with the monos. Well, the ART-9 is on steroids. Just amazing on mono recordings.
At under $1100.00 from LP Tunes, its a bargain. The ART-9 surpasses all cartridges I've had in the system before. That would include Dynavectors, Benz, Grado Signatures and a Lyra Clavis that I dearly loved. In fact, its more musically correct than the Clavis. The Clavis was the champ at reproducing the piano correctly ... the ART-9 is equally as good in this area.
Sound stage, depth of image, left to right all there. Highs ... crystalline. Mids ... female and male voices are dead on. Transparency ... see through. Dynamics ... Wow! Low noise floor ... black. Mono records ... who needs stereo?
Your assessment that the ART-9 doesn't draw attention to itself is dead on. You just don't think about the cartridge at all. Not what its doing, or what its not doing ... its just beautiful music filling the room.
Thanks again Pani for the recommendation. I'll keep posting here as the cartridge continues to break in.
http://www.acousticimage.com/
So, last night I had Mr. Golden Ears over to get his assessment as well. For a brand new cartridge that had zero hours on it ... all I can say is WOW! This is one naturally musical cartridge that doesn't break the bank. Its everything I liked about the OC9-mk III, but it goes far beyond the OC-9 in every respect.
In a previous post, I talked about the many mono records I own and how good the OC-9 was with the monos. Well, the ART-9 is on steroids. Just amazing on mono recordings.
At under $1100.00 from LP Tunes, its a bargain. The ART-9 surpasses all cartridges I've had in the system before. That would include Dynavectors, Benz, Grado Signatures and a Lyra Clavis that I dearly loved. In fact, its more musically correct than the Clavis. The Clavis was the champ at reproducing the piano correctly ... the ART-9 is equally as good in this area.
Sound stage, depth of image, left to right all there. Highs ... crystalline. Mids ... female and male voices are dead on. Transparency ... see through. Dynamics ... Wow! Low noise floor ... black. Mono records ... who needs stereo?
Your assessment that the ART-9 doesn't draw attention to itself is dead on. You just don't think about the cartridge at all. Not what its doing, or what its not doing ... its just beautiful music filling the room.
Thanks again Pani for the recommendation. I'll keep posting here as the cartridge continues to break in.
- ...
- 461 posts total
@pani thank you for the phono preamp recommendations. i may consider one at a later date but the Black Cube SE II is getting the job done for me- for now my tube integrated amplifier adds all the color I need. i did try loading the ART9 with 47Kohm. It sounded slightly more midrange biased but I prefer the sound overall at the 100ohm setting. as another "break through" the treble truly is starting to come alive on this cartridge. I was really doubtful that it would happen. not quite there yet but showing some great progress. definitely the best it has sounded yet and still sounds much better than the Ortofon 2M black- which I used to really like. the sweetness and cleanliness of the treble is what makes this one great (so far). |
Earlier we were discussing the rising top end in some the the high end MC cartridges. My friend Robert was kind enough to do some research to see what he could find on the frequency responses of some of the more popular cartridges. Robert writes a column on good records for Audio Beat and has done a lot of recording work and sales of audiophile recordings for both Cisco Music and Impex. Check it out: From Robert ... "Atlas: BTW, that's 8DB up at 20K! However, that really doesn't matter, but what does is the fact that 's up 5DB at 9K!!! Great for old Verves and RCA country records that droop in that region, but you'd better disconnect your tweeters if you wan't play the Beatles of Jascha Heifetz. http://s1164.photobucket.com/user/s33kw47h/media/LyraAtlas.jpg.html The Dorian is even worse, so I guess that's why you pay more for the Atlas. You can do better than both for a lot less. http://www.tnt-audio.com/gif/lyradorian_freq.gif For comparison, here's the far cheaper Dynavector 17D. I'll take the truth over that audiophile foolery. http://www.dynavector.com/products/images/17d3_f_response.gif Here's why the Denon 103s have such nice sound on brass and strings. No hype! http://gallery.audioasylum.com/cgi/gi.mpl?u=3771&f=DL-103R.JPG The OC9 graph is instructive. It has a obvious rise in the audible region, but but between 10-20K it's flat. I'm pretty sure the ART 9 has a similar rise, but I'm sure starts at a high frequency, hence a bit smoother sound. Nothing to get too concerned over, but I hear a slight one. http://www.dartmouth.tv/audio/images/AT-OC9ML-II.jpg Benz LP The only Benz I ever tried was the LO Glider. It stank in my system, but the Benz carts are certainly smooth on top, and I like that. http://digilander.libero.it/agostino.manzato/audio/reportage/mysonic/benz_lp.jpg For work related reasons I'll be sticking with Dynavector or Denon. Of course, response graphs don't give you the whole story, or we'd all have Shure V15-Vs, but they aren't BS either." |
- 461 posts total