Permanently sealing a vented subwoofer??


I have a budget subwoofer that I would like to tinker with if the results are positive. I read that to some degree, sealed subwoofers can produce much better in a music based system than a vented subwoofer. What would be the results if I permanently sealed the vent on a vented subwoofer? What are the consequences? Is this possible?
matchstikman
For any given driver (raw speaker), the box size for a good sealed box is usually biogger than the proper size ported box. When you put a driver in a sealed box that is too small, you get amplification at resonance - in other words a peak in the response. This will make the sub sound boomy. How much will depend on the very specifics of the driver and box. I would say go ahead with a temporary blockage. Maybe a block of wood held over the port with bungee cords around the sub. I agree that sealed boxes are almost always better than ported, so it's a worthwhile experiment. Also, make sure you get a good seal. Any leaks will become small ports with there own small wavelength resonances, which will sound like whistlilng. Kind of like the sound a pigeon makes when it flies if you are close to it.
Sean,

There's no "problem" with the theory. Whether foam plugs "work"
or not depends on what you are trying to do.

If one assumes that the speaker designer has done their job
correctly and has optimized the speaker design so that the
acoustical response of the system has the proper shape -
3rd order Butterworth filter, or whatever; then putting foam
in the port is going to mess that up.

However, that's not to say that it might not do what you
want. If you are willing to sacrifice the flatness of the
frequency response; you may well get a lower extension in
your bass. You just have to realize what you are sacrificing
for that lower extension.

I also agree that acoustic suspension is not inherently
better than a ported system. It is all in the quality and
execution of the design. Ported systems are more complex
than acoustic suspension - thus it is easier to muck up a
ported design than an acoustic suspension design. Perhaps
a bunch of poorly executed ported designs is what has given
ported designs a bad name.

In fact, a properly executed ported design can be advantageous.
With a sealed box, the designer has only the volume of the
box, in addition to the driver parameters; as a design
variable. In a ported system, there are additional design
parameters related to the port that give the designer
additional "degrees of freedom". A skillful designer can
put this additional design freedom to good use in improving
the design.

If one chooses a passive radiator design - which is a
special case of ported design - one can do even better.
That's because the compliance [ "spring constant" ] of the
radiator is an additional design variable - so the designer
has one more degree of freedom, than an open port.

Thus what could have been a 3rd order Butterworth can now
be a flatter 4th order Butterworth...

The classic speaker design papers by Thiele and Small
point this out.

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
I certainly dont agree that a sealed accustic suspension is easier to pull off the a port, if so then why is every damn speaker at Best Buy and Wall-Mart, Sears and so on ported? re-think it man!
Chadnliz,

READ my post again!!! I choose my words very carefully.

I said a PROPERLY designed ported speaker is more difficult
to design than an acoustic suspension.

There are lots of speakers that are ported that are not
designed to properly represent the transfer function of a
high pass filter.

It's not a matter of opinion - the ported system has more
design parameters than an acoustic suspension. Both have
the driver parameters in common. Add to that the volume
of the box - and you have the parameters for the
acoustic suspension. The ported design adds box volume,
plus a number of parameters related to the port - size of
port, acoustic impedance...

Don't tell me to re-think until you re-read!!!

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist